Behavioural activation versus mindfulness-based guided self-help treatment administered through a smartphone application: a randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 24413342
- PMCID: PMC3902198
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003440
Behavioural activation versus mindfulness-based guided self-help treatment administered through a smartphone application: a randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Objectives: Evaluating and comparing the effectiveness of two smartphone-delivered treatments: one based on behavioural activation (BA) and other on mindfulness.
Design: Parallel randomised controlled, open, trial. Participants were allocated using an online randomisation tool, handled by an independent person who was separate from the staff conducting the study.
Setting: General community, with recruitment nationally through mass media and advertisements.
Participants: 40 participants diagnosed with major depressive disorder received a BA treatment, and 41 participants received a mindfulness treatment. 9 participants were lost at the post-treatment.
Intervention ba: An 8-week long behaviour programme administered via a smartphone application. Mindfulness: An 8-week long mindfulness programme, administered via a smartphone application.
Main outcome measures: The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-9).
Results: 81 participants were randomised (mean age 36.0 years (SD=10.8)) and analysed. Results showed no significant interaction effects of group and time on any of the outcome measures either from pretreatment to post-treatment or from pretreatment to the 6-month follow-up. Subgroup analyses showed that the BA treatment was more effective than the mindfulness treatment among participants with higher initial severity of depression from pretreatment to the 6-month follow-up (PHQ-9: F (1, 362.1)=5.2, p<0.05). In contrast, the mindfulness treatment worked better than the BA treatment among participants with lower initial severity from pretreatment to the 6-month follow-up (PHQ-9: F (1, 69.3)=7.7, p<0.01); BDI-II: (F(1, 53.60)=6.25, p<0.05).
Conclusions: The two interventions did not differ significantly from one another. For participants with higher severity of depression, the treatment based on BA was superior to the treatment based on mindfulness. For participants with lower initial severity, the treatment based on mindfulness worked significantly better than the treatment based on BA.
Trial registration: Clinical Trials NCT01463020.
Keywords: Behavioral Activation; Depression; Mindfulness; Smartphone Application.
Figures
References
-
- Ebmeier K, Donaghey C, Steele J. Recent developments and current controversies in depression. Lancet 2006;367:153–67 - PubMed
-
- Smit F, Cuijpers P, Oostenbrink J, et al. Costs of nine common mental disorders: implications for curative and preventive psychiatry. J Ment Health Policy Econ 2006;9:193–200 - PubMed
-
- Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Andersson G, et al. Psychotherapy for depression in adults: a meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. J Consult Clin Psychol 2008;76:909–22 - PubMed
-
- Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Warmerdam L. Behavioral activation treatments of depression: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2007;27:318–26 - PubMed
-
- Dimidjian S, Barrera M, Martell C, et al. The origins and current status of behavioral activation treatments for depression. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2011;7:1–38 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical