Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;61(12):698-700.
doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.124737.

Prevalence of amblyopia in children undergoing nasolacrimal duct irrigation and probing

Affiliations

Prevalence of amblyopia in children undergoing nasolacrimal duct irrigation and probing

Ozlen Rodop Ozgur et al. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate ambylopia and amblyopia risk factors of children who underwent nasolacrimal duct (NLD) irrigation and probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO).

Materials and methods: The medical records of patients who had undergone NLD irrigation and probing for CNLDO at an age of 3 years or younger were reviewed, and 51 of the patients were recalled between October 1 and December 31, 2011 for a detailed ophthalmic examination to determinate amblyopia or amblyopia risk factors. Amblyopia was accepted as difference in visual acuity of two or more Snellen lines between the two eyes or visual acuity of 20/30 or worse in either eye.

Results: The median age of the 51 patients to whom NLD irrigation and probing were attempted for CNLDO was 23 months. CNLDO affected a total of 70 eyes. All patients were reviewed for best-corrected visual acuity, refractive errors, and strabismus at a median age of 70.5 months (range 31-95 months). Amblyopia or amblyopia risk factors were identified in 14 patients (27.5%). One child (7.15%) had only strabismus, six children (42.8%) had only amblyogenic refractive errors, two (14.3%) had a combination of two, one child (7.15%) had a family history for amblyopia, but four children (28.6%) had no amblyopia risk factors but had amblyopia.

Conclusion: Amblyogenic risk factors are found higher in patients with CNLDO and patients undergoing NLD irrigation and probing in comparison to normal population. Therefore, we recommend these children to routinely undergo cycloplegic refractions and full ophthalmic examinations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Simons K. Amblyopia characterization, treatment and prophylaxis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50:123–66. - PubMed
    1. Matta NS, Singman EL, Silbert DI. Prevalence of amblyopia risk factors in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J AAPOS. 2010;14:386–8. - PubMed
    1. Donahue SP, Arnold RW, Ruben JB for the AAPOS Vision Screening Committee. Preschool vision screening: What should we be detecting and show we report it. Uniform guidelines for reporting results of preschool vision screening studies? J AAPOS. 2003;7:314–6. - PubMed
    1. Ellis J JD, MacEwen CJ, Young JD. Can congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction interfere with visual development. A cohort case control study? J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1998;35:81–5. - PubMed
    1. Gigantelli JW. The lacrimal drainage system. In: Yanoff M, Duker JS, editors. Ophthalmology. Philadelphia: Mosby; 1999. p. 17.3.