Prevalence of amblyopia in children undergoing nasolacrimal duct irrigation and probing
- PMID: 24413822
- PMCID: PMC3917385
- DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.124737
Prevalence of amblyopia in children undergoing nasolacrimal duct irrigation and probing
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate ambylopia and amblyopia risk factors of children who underwent nasolacrimal duct (NLD) irrigation and probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO).
Materials and methods: The medical records of patients who had undergone NLD irrigation and probing for CNLDO at an age of 3 years or younger were reviewed, and 51 of the patients were recalled between October 1 and December 31, 2011 for a detailed ophthalmic examination to determinate amblyopia or amblyopia risk factors. Amblyopia was accepted as difference in visual acuity of two or more Snellen lines between the two eyes or visual acuity of 20/30 or worse in either eye.
Results: The median age of the 51 patients to whom NLD irrigation and probing were attempted for CNLDO was 23 months. CNLDO affected a total of 70 eyes. All patients were reviewed for best-corrected visual acuity, refractive errors, and strabismus at a median age of 70.5 months (range 31-95 months). Amblyopia or amblyopia risk factors were identified in 14 patients (27.5%). One child (7.15%) had only strabismus, six children (42.8%) had only amblyogenic refractive errors, two (14.3%) had a combination of two, one child (7.15%) had a family history for amblyopia, but four children (28.6%) had no amblyopia risk factors but had amblyopia.
Conclusion: Amblyogenic risk factors are found higher in patients with CNLDO and patients undergoing NLD irrigation and probing in comparison to normal population. Therefore, we recommend these children to routinely undergo cycloplegic refractions and full ophthalmic examinations.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Amblyopia risk factors in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: A longitudinal case-control study.PLoS One. 2019 Jun 13;14(6):e0217802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217802. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31194774 Free PMC article.
-
The prevalence of amblyogenic factors in children with persistent congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;252(11):1847-52. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2643-1. Epub 2014 Apr 29. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 24777709
-
Nasolacrimal duct obstruction: Does it really increase the risk of amblyopia in children?Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul;64(7):496-9. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.190101. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 27609160 Free PMC article.
-
Nasolacrimal Duct Probing for Young Children With Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstructions in China: A 10-Year Systematic Review.J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2019 Nov 1;56(6):365-372. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20190923-04. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2019. PMID: 31743404
-
[Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction from an ophthalmologist's point of view : Causes, diagnosis and staged therapeutic concept].HNO. 2016 Jun;64(6):367-75. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0124-z. HNO. 2016. PMID: 26912049 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Success rates of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction at various ages.BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 8;20(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01658-9. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 33032542 Free PMC article.
-
Unlocking the secrets of success in probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: investigating the factors that matter.Int Ophthalmol. 2024 May 8;44(1):221. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-02988-z. Int Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 38717720
-
Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction and Refractive Amblyopia Risk Factors: Effect of Age at the Time of Probing.Beyoglu Eye J. 2022 Feb 18;7(1):30-34. doi: 10.14744/bej.2021.30974. eCollection 2022. Beyoglu Eye J. 2022. PMID: 35265799 Free PMC article.
-
Anisometropia and refractive status in children with unilateral congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan-Mar;8(1):31-35. doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_77_17. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 29675347 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and Treatment Outcome of Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Saudi Children with Down Syndrome.Cureus. 2020 Jan 15;12(1):e6672. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6672. Cureus. 2020. PMID: 31976186 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Simons K. Amblyopia characterization, treatment and prophylaxis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50:123–66. - PubMed
-
- Matta NS, Singman EL, Silbert DI. Prevalence of amblyopia risk factors in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J AAPOS. 2010;14:386–8. - PubMed
-
- Donahue SP, Arnold RW, Ruben JB for the AAPOS Vision Screening Committee. Preschool vision screening: What should we be detecting and show we report it. Uniform guidelines for reporting results of preschool vision screening studies? J AAPOS. 2003;7:314–6. - PubMed
-
- Ellis J JD, MacEwen CJ, Young JD. Can congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction interfere with visual development. A cohort case control study? J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1998;35:81–5. - PubMed
-
- Gigantelli JW. The lacrimal drainage system. In: Yanoff M, Duker JS, editors. Ophthalmology. Philadelphia: Mosby; 1999. p. 17.3.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical