Predictors of minor versus major stroke during carotid artery stenting: results from the carotid artery stenting (CAS) registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK)
- PMID: 24414075
- DOI: 10.1007/s00392-013-0657-z
Predictors of minor versus major stroke during carotid artery stenting: results from the carotid artery stenting (CAS) registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK)
Abstract
Background: Patient outcome, quality of life as well as health care costs differ between patients with minor versus major stroke during carotid artery stenting. Evaluation of predictors for both subtypes of strokes is of paramount importance.
Methods and results: We analyzed data from the prospective, web-based German carotid artery stenting (CAS) registry. All patients entered in this registry were included as of January 2011. During the periprocedural period (until patient discharge or transfer) 1.5 % of the patients (85/5,794) sustained a major and 1.3 % (75/5,784) a minor stroke (total periprocedural stroke rate 2.8 %). Mean age of all patients was 71 years, 72 % were male and 50 % had a symptomatic carotid stenosis. Regression analysis identified age (OR 1.44; 95 % CI 1.05-1.98), symptomatic stenosis (OR 3.17; 95 % CI 1.74-5.76) and procedural duration per 10 min (OR 1.22; 95 % CI 1.13-1.31) as independent predictors for major strokes. Age (OR 1.43; 95 % CI 1.03-1.98), diabetes (OR 1.75; 95 % CI 1.04-2.94), and procedural duration (OR 1.17; 95 % CI 1.08-1.27) predicted for minor strokes. The use of an embolic protection device significantly prevented both type of strokes (OR 0.31; 95 % CI 0.15-0.62 for major strokes; OR 0.40; 95 % CI 0.18-0.91 for minor strokes), female patients suffered less major strokes (OR 0.47; 95 % CI 0.24-0.92). Moreover, minor and major strokes were associated with death, contralateral embolism and a longer hospital stay more frequently.
Conclusion: Patients with one or more risk factors for periprocedural stroke seem to require special attention in terms of optimal preprocedural assessment of the carotid stenosis and vascular anatomy, as well as adequate patient preparation. Identifying these risk factors may help in patient selection, encourage further refinement in carotid artery stenting technique and avoid procedural complications. The use of an embolic protection device system was associated with less periprocedural minor and major strokes.
Similar articles
-
Carotid artery stenting in clinical practice results from the Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS)-registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte (ALKK).Z Kardiol. 2005 Mar;94(3):163-72. doi: 10.1007/s00392-005-0195-4. Z Kardiol. 2005. PMID: 15747038
-
Carotid artery stenting in clinical practice: does sex matter? Results from the carotid artery stenting registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).Clin Cardiol. 2012 Feb;35(2):111-8. doi: 10.1002/clc.21015. Epub 2012 Jan 13. Clin Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22246970 Free PMC article.
-
Anatomic variables contributing to a higher periprocedural incidence of stroke and TIA in carotid artery stenting: single center experience of 833 consecutive cases.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug 1;80(2):321-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23483. Epub 2012 Mar 15. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012. PMID: 22422560
-
Use of Dual-Layered Stents in Endovascular Treatment of Extracranial Stenosis of the Internal Carotid Artery: Results of a Patient-Based Meta-Analysis of 4 Clinical Studies.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 10;11(23):2405-2411. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.06.047. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 30522670
-
Technical improvements in carotid revascularization based on the mechanism of procedural stroke.J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2019 Jun;60(3):313-324. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.19.10918-4. Epub 2019 Mar 1. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2019. PMID: 30827087 Review.
Cited by
-
Silent ischemic brain lesions after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: lesion distribution and predictors.Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 May;104(5):430-8. doi: 10.1007/s00392-014-0798-8. Epub 2015 Jan 18. Clin Res Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 25596724
-
In-stent restenosis after interventional treatment of carotid artery stenoses: a long-term follow-up of a single center cohort.Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Jul;106(7):493-500. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1078-1. Epub 2017 Feb 8. Clin Res Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28180940
-
Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 25;2(2):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32096559 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment Outcomes of Endovascular Embolization Only in Patients with Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Subgroup Analysis of ARUBA (A Randomized Trial of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations).AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Apr;41(4):676-680. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6443. Epub 2020 Feb 27. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020. PMID: 32115419 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical