Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2014 Jun;16(6):848-55.
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not241. Epub 2014 Jan 10.

Evaluation of amifostine for protection against cisplatin-induced serious hearing loss in children treated for average-risk or high-risk medulloblastoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Evaluation of amifostine for protection against cisplatin-induced serious hearing loss in children treated for average-risk or high-risk medulloblastoma

James G Gurney et al. Neuro Oncol. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate amifostine for protection from cisplatin-induced serious hearing loss in patients with average-risk medulloblastoma by extending a previous analysis to a much larger sample size. In addition, this study aimed to assess amifostine with serious hearing loss in patients with high-risk medulloblastoma treated with cisplatin.

Methods: Newly diagnosed medulloblastoma patients (n = 379; ages 3-21 years), enrolled on one of 2 sequential St. Jude clinical protocols that included 4 courses of 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin, were compared for hearing loss by whether or not they received 600 mg/m(2) of amifostine immediately before and 3 hours into each cisplatin infusion. Amifostine administration was not randomized. The last audiological evaluation between 5.5 and 24.5 months following protocol treatment initiation was graded using the Chang Ototoxicity Scale. A grade of ≥ 2b (loss requiring a hearing aid or deafness) was considered a serious event.

Results: Among average-risk patients (n = 263), amifostine was associated with protection from serious hearing loss (adjusted OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.14-0.64). For high-risk patients (n = 116), however, there was not sufficient evidence to conclude that amifostine prevented serious hearing loss (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.31-2.54).

Conclusions: Although patients in this study were not randomly assigned to amifostine treatment, we found evidence in favor of amifostine administration for protection against cisplatin-induced serious hearing loss in average-risk but not in high-risk, medulloblastoma patients.

Keywords: audiology; brain neoplasms; late effects; ototoxicity; platinum drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Flow diagram of study participation.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Cumulative proportion of ototoxicity versus time from protocol treatment initiation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Orgel E, Jain S, Ji L, et al. Hearing loss among survivors of childhood brain tumors treated with an irradiation-sparing approach. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012;58:953–958. - PubMed
    1. Lafay-Cousin L, Purdy E, Huang A, et al. Early cisplatin induced ototoxicity profile may predict the need for hearing support in children with medulloblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013;60:287–292. - PubMed
    1. Brock PR, Knight KR, Freyer DR, et al. Platinum-induced ototoxicity in children: a consensus review on mechanisms, predisposition, and protection, including a new International Society of Pediatric Oncology Boston Ototoxicity Scale. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2408–2417. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Der Hulst RJAM, Dreschler WA, Urbanus NAM. High frequency audiometry in prospective clinical research of ototoxicity due to platinum derivatives. Ann Otol Rhinol and Laryngol. 1998;97:133–137. - PubMed
    1. Li Y, Womer RB, Silber JH. Predicting cisplatin ototoxicity in children: the influence of age and the cumulative dose. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40:2445–2451. - PubMed

Publication types