Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Dec 30:4:157.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2013.00157.

The potential of polymeric micelles in the context of glioblastoma therapy

Affiliations
Review

The potential of polymeric micelles in the context of glioblastoma therapy

Ramin A Morshed et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), a type of malignant glioma, is the most common form of brain cancer found in adults. The current standard of care for GBM involves adjuvant temozolomide-based chemotherapy in conjunction with radiotherapy, yet patients still suffer from poor outcomes with a median survival of 14.6 months. Many novel therapeutic agents that are toxic to GBM cells in vitro cannot sufficiently accumulate at the site of an intracranial tumor after systemic administration. Thus, new delivery strategies must be developed to allow for adequate intratumoral accumulation of such therapeutic agents. Polymeric micelles offer the potential to improve delivery to brain tumors as they have demonstrated the capacity to be effective carriers of chemotherapy drugs, genes, and proteins in various preclinical GBM studies. In addition to this, targeting moieties and trigger-dependent release mechanisms incorporated into the design of these particles can promote more specific delivery of a therapeutic agent to a tumor site. However, despite these advantages, there are currently no micelle formulations targeting brain cancer in clinical trials. Here, we highlight key aspects of the design of polymeric micelles as therapeutic delivery systems with a review of their clinical applications in several non-brain tumor cancer types. We also discuss their potential to serve as nanocarriers targeting GBM, the major barriers preventing their clinical implementation in this disease context, as well as current approaches to overcome these limitations.

Keywords: controlled release; drug delivery; glioblastoma; micelles; nanoparticle; targeted delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Comparison of NK012 micelle formulation with bevacizumab and CPT-11 therapy. Athymic mice were injected intracranially with Luciferase-labeled U87MG and treated starting 8 days after tumor cell implantation. NK012 was delivered at 30 mg/kg intravenously three times every 4 days. CPT-11 was delivered at 67 or 40 mg/kg three times every 4 days in conjunction with bevacizumab, which was delivered at 5 mg/kg intraperitoneally six times every 4 days. Reproduced with permission from Kuroda et al. (2010).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Activatable low molecular weight protamine (ALMWP)-modified micelles allow for increased accumulation of paclitaxel in an intracranial C6 glioma model in nude mice. (A–C) In vivo fluorescence imaging taken of nude mice bearing intracranial C6 glioma tumors. Mice were injected intravenoulsy with DiR-labeled micelles (A), LMWP-micelles (B), and ALMWP-micelles (C). (D) Images of organs taken from mice sacrificed 24 h after intravenous injection of the various micelle particles. (E) Accumulation of intravenously injected compounds at the tumor site from 0.5 to 24 h after administration. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 was indicative of significant difference between the experimental and ALMWP-NP-PTX group. Error bars reflect the standard deviation. Reproduced with permission from Gu et al. (2013).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Overview of GBM-targeting mechanisms for micelle nanoparticles. (A) Section of brain containing a GBM tumor and normal brain parenchyma. (B) Close-up of tumor vasculature and surrounding glioma cells. Here, the vasculature displays disruption of the tight junctions between endothelial cells. Micelles can target tumors areas by two main pathways: (1) via the EPR effect where micelles diffuse passively through the disrupted BBB to reach glioma cells or (2) via interaction with endothelial cells and transcytosis to the tumor parenchyma. Examples of receptors more specific to the tumor vasculature and glioma cells include αvβ3 integrin and aminopeptidase N. (C) Close-up of normal vasculature with surrounding normal brain parenchyma. Here, micelles can interact with the intact BBB, allowing for transcytosis of particles. An example of a receptor mediating this pathway includes the Tf receptor. While receptor-mediated endocytosis is displayed in these images, other endothelial cell uptake mechanisms such as adsorptive-mediated endocytosis may take place at these sites as well.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbott N. J., Romero I. A. (1996). Transporting therapeutics across the blood-brain barrier. Mol. Med. Today 2 106–113 10.1016/1357-4310(96)88720-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abdullah Al N., Lee H., Lee Y. S., Lee K. D., Park S. Y. (2011). Development of disulfide core-crosslinked pluronic nanoparticles as an effective anticancer-drug-delivery system. Macromol. Biosci. 11 1264–1271 10.1002/mabi.201100083 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alami N., Banerjee K., Juste S., Page V., Brossard M., Hayashi T., et al. (2006). NC-6004, a novel cisplatin-incorporated polymeric micelle, is highly effective against oxaliplatin-resistant tumor models. AACR Meet. Abstr. 2006 133
    1. Allard E., Passirani C., Benoit J. P. (2009). Convection-enhanced delivery of nanocarriers for the treatment of brain tumors. Biomaterials 30 2302–2318 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arap W., Pasqualini R., Ruoslahti E. (1998). Cancer treatment by targeted drug delivery to tumor vasculature in a mouse model. Science 279 377–380 10.1126/science.279.5349.377 - DOI - PubMed