Antiretropulsion devices
- PMID: 24418744
- DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000032
Antiretropulsion devices
Abstract
Purpose of review: Stone migration during the treatment of ureteral stones can prove frustrating and increases both healthcare cost and patient morbidity. Antiretropulsion devices have been engineered to prevent stone migration.
Recent findings: Improvements in antiretropulsion devices allow for efficient prevention of stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy with minimal adverse effects or complications. Multiple devices are now available each with advantages and disadvantages. New devices are currently engineered to prevent stone migration and maintain ureteral access. Antiretropulsion devices appear to be cost-effective to prevent stone migration during intracorporeal lithotripsy.
Summary: Antiretropulsion devices have been safely and effectively used during ureteroscopic procedures. These tools increase stone-free rates, decrease morbidity and new studies have demonstrated their cost-effectiveness.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness of anti-retropulsion devices for ureteroscopic lithotripsy.J Urol. 2013 May;189(5):1762-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.085. Epub 2012 Nov 15. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23159589
-
The Dretler stone cone: a device to prevent ureteral stone migration-the initial clinical experience.J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):1985-8. J Urol. 2002. PMID: 11956424
-
Prevention of retrograde stone migration during ureteroscopy.Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2006 Feb;3(2):60-1. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro0376. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2006. PMID: 16470185 No abstract available.
-
Cost-effectiveness and health economics for ureteral and kidney stone disease: a systematic review of literature.Curr Opin Urol. 2025 Jul 1;35(4):368-376. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001216. Epub 2024 Aug 19. Curr Opin Urol. 2025. PMID: 39162117
-
NTrap in prevention of stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy for proximal ureteral stones: a meta-analysis.J Endourol. 2012 Feb;26(2):130-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0392. J Endourol. 2012. PMID: 22092448 Review.
Cited by
-
A study on the clinical application of a patented perfusion and suctioning platform and ureteral access sheath in the treatment of large ureteral stones below L4 level.Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Feb;51(2):207-213. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-2049-9. Epub 2018 Dec 7. Int Urol Nephrol. 2019. PMID: 30536191 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Use of a modified ureteral access sheath in semi-rigid ureteroscopy to treat large upper ureteral stones is associated with high stone free rates.Asian J Urol. 2019 Jul;6(3):217-221. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.12.008. Epub 2019 Jan 7. Asian J Urol. 2019. PMID: 31297312 Free PMC article.
-
Inadvertent Stone Migration During Pneumatic Lithotripsy: Still a Conundrum in the 21st Century.Cureus. 2020 Sep 18;12(9):e10521. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10521. Cureus. 2020. PMID: 33094062 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Suctioning semirigid ureteroscopic lithotomy versus minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a retrospective study.Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Mar;10(3):1056-1063. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1218. Transl Androl Urol. 2021. PMID: 33850740 Free PMC article.
-
Update of the ICUD-SIU consultation on stone technology behind ureteroscopy.World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1353-1359. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2073-x. Epub 2017 Jul 25. World J Urol. 2017. PMID: 28744695 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials