Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 May;21(2):113-24.
doi: 10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000025.

Conservative physical therapy management for the treatment of cervicogenic headache: a systematic review

Stephanie Racicki  1 , Sarah Gerwin  1 , Stacy Diclaudio  1 , Samuel Reinmann  1 , Megan Donaldson  1
Affiliations
Review

Conservative physical therapy management for the treatment of cervicogenic headache: a systematic review

Stephanie Racicki et al. J Man Manip Ther. 2013 May.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of conservative physical therapy management of cervicogenic headache (CGH).

Introduction: CGH affects 22-25% of the adult population with females being four times more affected than men. CGHs are thought to arise from musculoskeletal impairments in the neck with symptoms most commonly consisting of suboccipital neck pain, dizziness, and lightheadedness. Currently, both invasive and non-invasive techniques are available to address these symptoms; however, the efficacy of non-invasive treatment techniques has yet to be established.

Methods: Computerized searches of CINAHL, ProQuest, PubMed, MEDLINE, and SportDiscus, were performed to obtain a qualitative analysis of the literature. Inclusion criteria were: randomized controlled trial design, population diagnosed with CGH using the International Headache Society classification, at least one baseline measurement and one outcomes measure, and assessment of a conservative technique. Physiotherapy evidence-based database scale was utilized for quality assessment.

Results: One computerized database search and two hand searches yielded six articles. Of the six included randomized controlled trials, all were considered to be of 'good quality' utilizing the physiotherapy evidence-based database scale. The interventions utilized were: therapist-driven cervical manipulation and mobilization, self-applied cervical mobilization, cervico-scapular strengthening, and therapist-driven cervical and thoracic manipulation. With the exception of one study, all reported reduction in pain and disability, as well as improvement in function.

Conclusion: Calculated effect sizes allowed comparison of intervention groups between studies. A combination of therapist-driven cervical manipulation and mobilization with cervico-scapular strengthening was most effective for decreasing pain outcomes in those with CGH.

Keywords: Cervicogenic headaches; Conservative management; Physical therapy management; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart of inclusion.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Jensen R, Katsarava Z, Lipton R, Scher A, et al. The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia. 2007;27:193–210 - PubMed
    1. Jensen R, Stovner LJ. Epidemiology and comorbidity of headache. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:354–61 - PubMed
    1. Pfaffenrath V, Kaube H. Diagnostics of cervical headache. Funct Neurol. 1990;5:157–64 - PubMed
    1. Nilsson N. A randomized controlled trial of the effect of spinal manipulation in the treatment of cervicogenic headache. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995;18:435–40 - PubMed
    1. Haldeman S, Dagenais S. Cervicogenic headaches: a critical review. Spine J. 2001;1:31–46 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources