Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan 14:14:5.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-5.

Electronic immunization data collection systems: application of an evaluation framework

Christine L Heidebrecht, Jeffrey C Kwong, Michael Finkelstein, Sherman D Quan, Jennifer A Pereira, Susan Quach, Shelley L Deeks  1
Affiliations

Electronic immunization data collection systems: application of an evaluation framework

Christine L Heidebrecht et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. .

Abstract

Background: Evaluating the features and performance of health information systems can serve to strengthen the systems themselves as well as to guide other organizations in the process of designing and implementing surveillance tools. We adapted an evaluation framework in order to assess electronic immunization data collection systems, and applied it in two Ontario public health units.

Methods: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems are broad in nature and serve as an organizational tool to guide the development of comprehensive evaluation materials. Based on these Guidelines, and informed by other evaluation resources and input from stakeholders in the public health community, we applied an evaluation framework to two examples of immunization data collection and examined several system attributes: simplicity, flexibility, data quality, timeliness, and acceptability. Data collection approaches included key informant interviews, logic and completeness assessments, client surveys, and on-site observations.

Results: Both evaluated systems allow high-quality immunization data to be collected, analyzed, and applied in a rapid fashion. However, neither system is currently able to link to other providers' immunization data or provincial data sources, limiting the comprehensiveness of coverage assessments. We recommended that both organizations explore possibilities for external data linkage and collaborate with other jurisdictions to promote a provincial immunization repository or data sharing platform.

Conclusions: Electronic systems such as the ones described in this paper allow immunization data to be collected, analyzed, and applied in a rapid fashion, and represent the infostructure required to establish a population-based immunization registry, critical for comprehensively assessing vaccine coverage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Data flow: Algoma Public Health (APH).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Data flow: Niagara Region Public Health (NRPH).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Public Health Agency of Canada. Influenza. 2012. http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/influenza/index-eng.php.
    1. Laroche JA, Diniz AJ. Immunisation registers in Canada: progress made, current situation, and challenges for the future. Euro Surveill. 2012;17:20158. - PubMed
    1. Heidebrecht CL, Pereira JA, Quach S, Foisy J, Quan SD, Finkelstein M, Deeks SL, Guay M, Bettinger JA, Kolbe F, Crowcroft NS, Sikora CA, Buckeridge DL, Kwong JC. Approaches to immunization data collection employed across Canada during the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccination campaign. Can J Public Health. 2011;102:349–54. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2001;50(RR-13):1–35. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Progress in immunization information systems - United States, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(1):10–12. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources