Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan 14:7:37.
doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-37.

User and researcher collaborations in mental health in low and middle income countries: a case study of the EMPOWER project

Affiliations

User and researcher collaborations in mental health in low and middle income countries: a case study of the EMPOWER project

Esha Gupta et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Background: Increasing recognition has been given to the interaction of users and researchers in shaping the perspective and practice of mental health care. However, there remains very little evidence exploring how this interaction works, particularly in low and middle income countries. The aim of this study was to explore experiences of how users and researchers worked together to communicate research, using a case study of the EMPOWER project.

Methods: The study followed a case-study approach. EMPOWER was a project that sought to strengthen the capacity of user organizations in India, Kenya, Nepal and Zambia by encouraging user-researcher collaborations to communicate research findings in the four countries. A qualitative research method was applied for this study, with semi-structured interviews conducted with seven people: two researchers, one communications developer, and four user group members (one from each of the four countries). Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: The findings indicated positive perceptions of the collaboration between researchers and users. Key themes were partnership and support, the value of the personal experience of users and their knowledge of the target audiences, and empowerment. Key challenges related to differences in levels of education and technical knowledge and the lack of payments to users.

Conclusions: This exploratory study provides insight to help understand collaborative processes for communicating mental health research. It highlights many positive outcomes from the EMPOWER collaboration but also highlights the need for more in-depth research on this issue.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. WHO. The World Health Report 2001—Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
    1. Wallcraft J, Nettle M. In: Handbook of service user involvement in mental health research. Wallcraft J, Schrank B, Amering M, editor. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. History, context and language; pp. 1–11.
    1. Rose D. Collaborative research between users and professions: peaks and pitfalls. Psychiatr Bull. 2003;27:404–406. doi: 10.1192/pb.27.11.404. - DOI
    1. Faulkner A, Thomas P. User-led research and evidence-based medicine. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180:1–3. doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.1.1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crawford MJ. et al.Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ. 2002;325(7375):1263. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7375.1263. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources