Time to clinically significant visual acuity gains after ranibizumab treatment for retinal vein occlusion: BRAVO and CRUISE trials
- PMID: 24424249
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.11.022
Time to clinically significant visual acuity gains after ranibizumab treatment for retinal vein occlusion: BRAVO and CRUISE trials
Abstract
Purpose: To assess time to first achievement of clinically significant visual acuity (VA) gains from baseline in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) receiving ranibizumab versus sham treatment.
Design: Post hoc analyses of 2 phase 3 clinical trials assessing efficacy and safety of ranibizumab in patients with branch RVO (Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety [BRAVO] study; NCT00061594) and central RVO (Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema after Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Study: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety [CRUISE]; NCT00056836) over 12 months.
Participants: Seven hundred eighty-nine patients (BRAVO, n = 397; CRUISE, n = 392).
Intervention: Randomization to monthly intraocular ranibizumab injections (0.3 mg/0.5 mg) or sham. After 6 monthly injections (treatment period), patients meeting prespecified criteria received as-needed (pro re nata [PRN]) ranibizumab at their assigned dose (sham patients, ranibizumab 0.5 mg) through month 12 (observation period). BRAVO patients meeting specific eligibility criteria could receive rescue laser treatment once during the treatment and once during the observation periods.
Main outcome measures: Time to first gain of 15 letters or more from baseline, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. To evaluate the effect of delaying ranibizumab treatment, sham patients' VA data also were analyzed, with month 6 considered as baseline to assess vision gains during the 6 months of receiving ranibizumab PRN.
Results: Median time to first 15-letter or more gain from baseline was 12.0 (sham), 4.8 (ranibizumab 0.3 mg), and 4.0 months (ranibizumab 0.5 mg) in BRAVO and 12.2, 5.9, and 5.2 months, respectively, in CRUISE. The cumulative proportion of patients who had ever gained 15 letters or more from baseline by month 12 was 50% (sham), 68% (ranibizumab 0.3 mg), and 71% (ranibizumab 0.5 mg) in BRAVO and 42%, 61%, and 66%, respectively, in CRUISE. After 6 months of ranibizumab PRN treatment, a cumulative 10.8% (BRAVO) and 26.2% (CRUISE) of initially sham-treated patients ever gained 15 letters or more.
Conclusions: This retrospective analysis shows that more than 50% of patients treated with monthly ranibizumab achieved clinically significant vision gains during the initial 6 months of treatment, which largely were maintained using PRN treatment to 12 months. In comparison, less than 50% of patients initially randomized to sham (and later receiving ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN treatment) ever achieved clinically significant vision gains. These results suggest that initiating treatment immediately after diagnosis may provide the greatest vision gains. The potential benefits of early treatment should be evaluated further in prospective clinical studies.
Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Reading speed improvements in retinal vein occlusion after ranibizumab treatment.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;131(7):851-6. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.114. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013. PMID: 23699977 Clinical Trial.
-
Ranibizumab for macular edema due to retinal vein occlusions: long-term follow-up in the HORIZON trial.Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):802-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Feb 1. Ophthalmology. 2012. PMID: 22301066 Clinical Trial.
-
Improved vision-related function after ranibizumab for macular edema after retinal vein occlusion: results from the BRAVO and CRUISE trials.Ophthalmology. 2012 Oct;119(10):2108-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jul 18. Ophthalmology. 2012. PMID: 22817833 Clinical Trial.
-
[BRAVO and CRUISE: ranibizumab for the treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion].Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2012 Dec;87 Suppl 1:46-53. doi: 10.1016/s0365-6691(12)70051-5. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2012. PMID: 24278989 Review. Spanish.
-
Retinal Vein Occlusion.Dev Ophthalmol. 2016;55:147-53. doi: 10.1159/000438971. Epub 2015 Oct 26. Dev Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 26501219 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of changes in number of hyperreflective dots after intravitreal ranibizumab or dexamethasone implant in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion.Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2023 May 23;14(3):387-393. doi: 10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-22-00177. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 39430351 Free PMC article.
-
Microaneurysms cause refractory macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion.Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 8;6:29445. doi: 10.1038/srep29445. Sci Rep. 2016. PMID: 27389770 Free PMC article.
-
[Statement of the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists (BVA), the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG) and the Retinological Society (RG) on intravitreal treatment of vision-reducing macular edema by retinal vein occlusion : Treatment strategies, status 24 April 2018].Ophthalmologe. 2018 Oct;115(10):842-854. doi: 10.1007/s00347-018-0775-0. Ophthalmologe. 2018. PMID: 30143857 Review. German. No abstract available.
-
Association between time to treatment and outcome in branch retinal vein occlusion.Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug 25;44(1):353. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03272-w. Int Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 39182206
-
Epithelial Membrane Protein-2 (EMP2) Antibody Blockade Reduces Corneal Neovascularization in an In Vivo Model.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 Jan 2;60(1):245-254. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-24345. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019. PMID: 30646013 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical