Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug;75(4):306-10.
doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0492-x. Epub 2012 Apr 19.

A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Non-absorbable Polypropylene (Prolene®) and Delayed Absorbable Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl®) Suture Material in Mass Closure of Vertical Laparotomy Wounds

Affiliations

A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Non-absorbable Polypropylene (Prolene®) and Delayed Absorbable Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl®) Suture Material in Mass Closure of Vertical Laparotomy Wounds

Sharad Pandey et al. Indian J Surg. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

Wound dehiscence is a postoperative complication encountered following abdominal surgery. A prospective randomized study was conducted to compare the incidence of wound dehiscence with a delayed absorbable and a nonabsorbable suture material in the mass closure of vertical laparotomy wounds. In one group, 100 patients were analyzed after closure with Prolene®, and in another group, 100 patients were analyzed after closure with Vicryl®. The incision was closed by continuous far and near suture technique using polypropylene (Prolene) suture in one group and a synthetic delayed absorbable polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) suture in the other group. There was significant difference in the incidence of wound dehiscence between the two groups: 6 % with Prolene and 17 % with Vicryl, (χ (2) = 5.944, 1 DF, P value = 0.0148). The overall incidence of wound dehiscence was 11.5 % in this study. The incidence of wound dehiscence in both the study groups was higher than expected as compared to previous literature. There was a significant difference between the two suture materials. In our study, Prolene is a better suture material for closure of vertical laparotomy wounds.

Keywords: Mass closure; Polyglactin; Polypropylene; Vertical laparotomy wounds; Wound dehiscence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT diagram for the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Bar diagram showing percentage of wound dehiscence

References

    1. Guiney EJ, Morris PJ, Donaldson GA. Wound dehiscence. A continuing problem in abdominal surgery. Arch Surg. 1966;92:47–51. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1966.01320190049011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Efron G. Abdominal wound disruption. Lancet. 1965;1(7399):1287–1290. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(65)92777-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mayo Ch W, Lee MJ. Separations of abdominal wounds. A M A Arch Surg. 1951;62(6):883–894. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1951.01250030894016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hodgson NCF, Malthaner RA, Ostbye T. The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure. A meta analysis. Ann Surg. 2000;231(3):436–442. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200003000-00018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ceydeli A, Wise L. Finding the best abdominal closure an evidence based review of the literature. Curr Surg. 2005;62:220–225. doi: 10.1016/j.cursur.2004.08.014. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources