Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar;8(1):67-70.
doi: 10.1007/s11552-012-9478-1.

Decreasing the pain of finger block injection: level II evidence

Nicolas D Hamelin  1 , Hugo St-Amand  2 , Donald H Lalonde  3 , Patrick G Harris  1 , Jean-Paul Brutus  4
Affiliations

Decreasing the pain of finger block injection: level II evidence

Nicolas D Hamelin et al. Hand (N Y). 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Background: There is level II evidence that volunteers prefer the single subcutaneous injection in the midline of the proximal phalanx with lidocaine and epinephrine (SIMPLE) finger block over the classic two dorsal injection block technique. The purpose of this study was to possibly further decrease the pain of digital block injection by examining the effect of the duration of injection on the pain felt by volunteers receiving the SIMPLE block at two different injection rates.

Methods: Forty healthy blinded volunteers were injected 2 mL of lidocaine 1 % and epinephrine 1/100,000 in the digital palmar crease of both long fingers, one at a time. Two different rates of injection were used: 8 and 60 s. Pain scores were measured using a visual analogue scale and the volunteers were asked which of injection techniques they preferred.

Results: The visual analogue scale results revealed less pain with the slow injection (p < 0.001). Thirty three out of 40 volunteers preferred the slow injection rate. No difference could be attributed to sex of participants or to the first hand injected.

Conclusion: Blinded volunteers preferred digital blocks injected over 60 s to the more rapid 8 s. Decreasing the pain of injection only takes a minute of our valuable time for finger blocks.

Keywords: Digital block; Epinephrine; Injection rate; Lidocaine; Pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Screen preventing the subject from observing the rate of injection during the experiment
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Braun H, Harris ML. Operation on the extremities. In Local anesthesia: its scientific basis and practical use, 2nd American edition from the 6th revised German edition. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1914. p. 367.
    1. Brutus JP, Baeten Y, Chahidi N, et al. Single injection digital block: comparison between three techniques. Chir Main. 2002;21(3):182–187. doi: 10.1016/S1297-3203(02)00107-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cepeda MS, Tzortzopoulou A, Thackrey M, et al. Adjusting the pH of lidocaine for reducing pain on injection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010;8(12): Art. No.: CD006581. - PubMed
    1. Cummings AJ, Tisol WB, Meyer LE. Modified transthecal digital block versus traditional digital block for anesthesia of the finger. J Hand Surg Am. 2004;29(1):44–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2003.09.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Denkler K. A comprehensive review of epinephrine in the finger: to do or not to do. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(1):114–124. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200107000-00017. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources