Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 Jan 10;9(1):e83668.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083668. eCollection 2014.

Neuroimaging of reading intervention: a systematic review and activation likelihood estimate meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Neuroimaging of reading intervention: a systematic review and activation likelihood estimate meta-analysis

Laura A Barquero et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

A growing number of studies examine instructional training and brain activity. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature regarding neuroimaging of reading intervention, with a particular focus on reading difficulties (RD). To locate relevant studies, searches of peer-reviewed literature were conducted using electronic databases to search for studies from the imaging modalities of fMRI and MEG (including MSI) that explored reading intervention. Of the 96 identified studies, 22 met the inclusion criteria for descriptive analysis. A subset of these (8 fMRI experiments with post-intervention data) was subjected to activation likelihood estimate (ALE) meta-analysis to investigate differences in functional activation following reading intervention. Findings from the literature review suggest differences in functional activation of numerous brain regions associated with reading intervention, including bilateral inferior frontal, superior temporal, middle temporal, middle frontal, superior frontal, and postcentral gyri, as well as bilateral occipital cortex, inferior parietal lobules, thalami, and insulae. Findings from the meta-analysis indicate change in functional activation following reading intervention in the left thalamus, right insula/inferior frontal, left inferior frontal, right posterior cingulate, and left middle occipital gyri. Though these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of studies and the disparate methodologies used, this paper is an effort to synthesize across studies and to guide future exploration of neuroimaging and reading intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Systematic review flow diagram.
(PRISMA template; Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, Altman, & The PRISMA Group, 2009).
Figure 2
Figure 2. ALE results.
Clusters exceeding the recommended 2642 threshold are L thalamus, R insula/inferior frontal gyrus, L inferior frontal gyrus, R posterior cingulate, and L middle occipital gyrus (FDR, q<.05; Talairach, z = 12).

References

    1. Stanovich KE (1986) Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Read Res Q 21: 360–407.
    1. Morgan PL, Farkas G, Hibel J (2008) Matthew effects for whom? Learn Disabil Q 31: 187–198. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fletcher JM (2009) Dyslexia: The evolution of a scientific concept. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 15: 501–508 doi:10.1017/S1355617709090900 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Torgesen JK, Wagner RK, Rashotte CA, Rose E, Lindamood P, et al. (1999) Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. J Educ Psychol 91: 579–593.
    1. Shankweiler D, Lundquist E, Katz L, Stuebing KK, Fletcher JM, et al. (1999) Comprehension and Decoding: Patterns of Association in Children With Reading Difficulties. Sci Stud Read 3: 69–94 doi:_10.1207/s1532799xssr0301_4 - DOI

Publication types