Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr 6;3(2):20120094.
doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2012.0094.

Impact of blood rheology on wall shear stress in a model of the middle cerebral artery

Affiliations

Impact of blood rheology on wall shear stress in a model of the middle cerebral artery

Miguel O Bernabeu et al. Interface Focus. .

Abstract

Perturbations to the homeostatic distribution of mechanical forces exerted by blood on the endothelial layer have been correlated with vascular pathologies, including intracranial aneurysms and atherosclerosis. Recent computational work suggests that, in order to correctly characterize such forces, the shear-thinning properties of blood must be taken into account. To the best of our knowledge, these findings have never been compared against experimentally observed pathological thresholds. In this work, we apply the three-band diagram (TBD) analysis due to Gizzi et al. (Gizzi et al. 2011 Three-band decomposition analysis of wall shear stress in pulsatile flows. Phys. Rev. E 83, 031902. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.83.031902)) to assess the impact of the choice of blood rheology model on a computational model of the right middle cerebral artery. Our results show that, in the model under study, the differences between the wall shear stress predicted by a Newtonian model and the well-known Carreau-Yasuda generalized Newtonian model are only significant if the vascular pathology under study is associated with a pathological threshold in the range 0.94-1.56 Pa, where the results of the TBD analysis of the rheology models considered differs. Otherwise, we observe no significant differences.

Keywords: blood flow modelling; lattice Boltzmann; multi-scale modelling; rheology; three-band diagram analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Three-dimensional model of a subset of the right MCA used in this work. Geometry segments are labelled A–E for later reference. The arrows indicate flow direction. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Dynamic viscosity η as a function of shear rate formula image for the CY and the Newtonian models. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
One-dimensional model of the main arteries in the upper body. Each segment (solid line) represents a different part of a human arterial system including characterization of the three-dimensional model of the right MCA in figure 1 (see top right arrow). Segment lengths are not to scale. The dots represent (i) bifurcations, when found at the intersection of two or more segments, (ii) zero-dimensional representations of the peripheral vasculature, when found at the end of an open-ended segment, or (iii) the heart in the case labelled with H. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Pressure differentials, relative to outlet D, obtained from the one-dimensional model at the inlet and outlets. Simulations were run for a total of three cardiac cycles. Inlet A, solid line; outlet C, dashed line; outlet E, dotted line. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Traction vector t (estimated with the CY rheology model) at the upstream bifurcation of the three-dimensional model. Vectors are scaled according to their magnitude. Points x3 and x4 in table 2 are shown in green and magenta, respectively. Visualizations generated with the open source software package ParaView [29]. (a) End of diastole t = 1.82 s; (b) peak flow during systole t = 1.97 s.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
TBD analysis at points x3, x4 and x5. The values of N,0,+(σ) are presented as a stacked histogram. (a) Newtonian TBD at x3, (b) CY TBD at x3, (c) Newtonian TBD at x4, (d) CY TBD at x4, (e) Newtonian TBD at x5, and (f) CY TBD at x5.

References

    1. Rivero-Arias O, Gray A, Wolstenholme J. 2010. Burden of disease and costs of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) in the United Kingdom. Cost Effectiveness Resour. Allocation 8, 6.10.1186/1478-7547-8-6 (doi:10.1186/1478-7547-8-6) - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stehbens WE. 1989. Etiology of intracranial berry aneurysms. J. Neurosurg. 70, 823–83110.3171/jns.1989.70.6.0823 (doi:10.3171/jns.1989.70.6.0823) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shojima M, Oshima M, Takagi K, Torii R, Hayakawa M, Katada K, Morita A, Kirino T. 2004. Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysm. Stroke 35, 2500–250510.1161/01.STR.0000144648.89172.0f (doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000144648.89172.0f) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chatzizisis YS, et al. 2008. Prediction of the localization of high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques on the basis of low endothelial shear stress. Circulation 117, 993–100210.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.695254 (doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.695254) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mejia J, Mongrain R, Bertrand OF. 2011. Accurate prediction of wall shear stress in a stented artery: Newtonian versus non-Newtonian models. J. Biomech. Eng. 133, 074501.10.1115/1.4004408 (doi:10.1115/1.4004408) - DOI - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources