Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan 15:15:16.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-15-16.

Nephrologists' perspectives on dialysis treatment: results of an international survey

Richard J Fluck  1 , Denis Fouque, Robert S Lockridge Jr
Affiliations

Nephrologists' perspectives on dialysis treatment: results of an international survey

Richard J Fluck et al. BMC Nephrol. .

Abstract

Background: In-centre haemodialysis (ICHD) is the most common dialysis method used by patients worldwide. However, quality of life and clinical outcomes in patients treated via ICHD have not improved for some time. 'High-dose' haemodialysis (HD) regimens--which are longer and/or more frequent than conventional regimens and are particularly suitable to delivery in the home--may offer a route to improved outcomes and quality of life. This survey aimed to determine nephrologists' views on the validity of alternatives to ICHD, particularly home HD and high-dose HD.

Methods: A total of 1,500 nephrologists from Europe, Canada and the United States were asked to respond to an online questionnaire that was designed following previous qualitative research. Certified nephrologists in practice for 2-35 years who managed >25 adult dialysis patients were eligible to take part.

Results: A total of 324 nephrologists completed the survey. ICHD was the most common type of dialysis used by respondents' current patients (90%), followed by peritoneal dialysis (8%) and home HD (2%). The majority of respondents believed that: home HD provides better quality of life; increasing the frequency of dialysis beyond three times per week significantly improves clinical outcomes; and longer dialysis sessions performed nocturnally would result in significantly better clinical outcomes than traditional ICHD.

Conclusions: Survey results indicated that many nephrologists believe that home HD and high-dose HD are better for the patient. However, the majority of their patients were using ICHD. Education, training and support on alternative dialysis regimens are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of patients receiving different forms of dialysis treatment by country. HHD, home haemodialysis; ICHD, in-centre haemodialysis; PD, peritoneal dialysis, n = number of respondents per country.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Nephrologists’ attitudes towards different dialysis modalities. Responses to statements around the effects of different dialysis modalities on (A) quality of life and (B) clinical outcomes. HHD, home haemodialysis; QoL, quality of life; ICHD, in-centre haemodialysis; PD, peritoneal dialysis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Nephrologists’ dialysis recommendations to patients in fictional case studies. (A) Patient has relatively good health and is new to dialysis; (B) Patient has relatively poor health and is already on ICHD. HHD, home haemodialysis; ICHD, in-centre haemodialysis; PD, peritoneal dialysis. *Self-care HD = patients attend outpatient facilities with no/very limited nurse supervision and no attending doctor (France only).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Weiner DE. Public health consequences of chronic kidney disease. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;86:566–569. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.137. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eggers PW. Has the incidence of end-stage renal disease in the USA and other countries stabilized? Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2011;20:241–245. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e3283454319. - DOI - PubMed
    1. U.S. Renal Data System. USRDS 2011: Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2011.
    1. ERA-EDTA Registry. ERA-EDTA Registry Annual Report 2009. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Academic Medical Center, Department of Medical Informatics; 2011.
    1. Lameire N, van Biesen W, Vanholder R. Did 20 years of technological innovations in hemodialysis contribute to better patient outcomes? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4(Suppl 1):S30–S40. - PubMed

Publication types