Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Feb;18(2):233-9.
doi: 10.5588/ijtld.13.0468.

Performance of the MTBDRsl assay in Georgia

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Performance of the MTBDRsl assay in Georgia

N Tukvadze et al. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Setting: The country of Georgia has a high burden of multi- (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB).

Objective: To assess the performance of the GenoType® MTBDRsl assay in the detection of resistance to kanamycin (KM), capreomycin (CPM) and ofloxacin (OFX), and of XDR-TB.

Design: Consecutive acid-fast bacilli smear-positive sputum specimens identified as MDR-TB using the MTBDRplus test were evaluated with the MTBDRsl assay and conventional second-line drug susceptibility testing (DST).

Results: Among 159 specimens, amplification was adequate in 154 (97%), including 9 of 9 culture-negative and 2 of 3 contaminated specimens. Second-line DST revealed that 17 (12%) Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates were XDR-TB. Compared to DST, the MTBDRsl had 41% sensitivity and 98% specificity in detecting XDR-TB and 81% sensitivity and 99% specificity in detecting OFX resistance. Sensitivity was low in detecting resistance to KM (29%) and CPM (57%), while specificity was respectively 99% and 94%. Median times from sputum collection to second-line DST and MTBDRsl results were 70-104 vs. 10 days.

Conclusion: Although the MTBDRsl assay had a rapid turnaround time, detection of second-line drug resistance was poor compared to DST. Further genetic mutations associated with resistance to second-line drugs should be included in the assay to improve test performance and clinical utility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sputum culture results for all AFB smear positive tuberculosis suspects and corresponding complete MTBDRsl assay results
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of MTBDRsl assay results according to phenotypic drug-resistance patterns using conventional drug susceptibility testing

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. Global tuberculosis control: WHO report 2012. WHO/HTM/20126. 2012.
    1. Abubakar I, Zignol M, Falzon D, Raviglione M, Ditiu L, Masham S, et al. Drug-resistant tuberculosis: time for visionary political leadership. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Epub 2013/03/28. - PubMed
    1. Raviglione M. XDR-TB: entering the post-antibiotic era? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006;10(11):1185–1187. Epub 2006/11/30. - PubMed
    1. Tukvadze N, Kempker RR, Kalandadze I, Kurbatova E, Leonard MK, Apsindzelashvili R, et al. Use of a molecular diagnostic test in AFB smear positive tuberculosis suspects greatly reduces time to detection of multidrug resistant tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31563. Epub 2012/02/22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nehren, Germany: Hain Lifescience; [accessed April 15, 2013]. Genotype MTBDRsl, product page. http://www.hain-lifescience.de.en/products/microbiology/mycobacteria/gen....

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources