Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Apr;399(4):421-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1161-2. Epub 2014 Jan 16.

Machine perfusion in solid organ transplantation: where is the benefit?

Affiliations
Review

Machine perfusion in solid organ transplantation: where is the benefit?

Helge Bruns et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Machine perfusion (MP) in solid organ transplantation has been a topic of variable importance for decades. At the dawn of organ transplantation, MP was one of the standard techniques for preservation; today's gold standard for organ preservation for transplantation is cold storage (CS). The outcome after transplantation of solid organs has tremendously improved over the last five decades. MP has been continuously under investigation and may be an option for organ preservation in selected cases; however, there is only little evidence from clinical trials that can be used to advocate for MP as a routine organ preservation method.

Methods: This article reviews the current knowledge on MP in the field of solid organ transplantation with special focus on findings from clinical trials.

Conclusion: Especially in heart and lung transplantation, MP seems to be a promising tool to improve postoperative outcome, but a general evidence-based recommendation for or against an application of MP cannot be given due to the lack of the highest level of clinical evidence. Gold standards such as CS should not be left behind without good reason. Randomized clinical trials are desperately needed to further improve outcome and for better understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Transplantation. 1985 Dec;40(6):659-61 - PubMed
    1. Transplantation. 2007 Feb 15;83(3):247-53 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 2001 Mar 17;357(9259):825-9 - PubMed
    1. Transpl Int. 2010 Sep;23(9):944-50 - PubMed
    1. Liver Transpl. 2009 Jul;15(7):798-805 - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources