Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Fall;38(3):387-428.
doi: 10.1177/009145091103800304.

How do researchers categorize drugs, and how do drug users categorize them?

Juliet P Lee  1 , Tamar M J Antin  1
Affiliations

How do researchers categorize drugs, and how do drug users categorize them?

Juliet P Lee et al. Contemp Drug Probl. 2012 Fall.

Abstract

This paper considers drug classifications and terms widely used in US survey research, and compares these to classifications and terms used by drug users. We begin with a critical review of drug classification systems, including those oriented to public policy and health services as well as survey research. We then consider the results of a pile sort exercise we conducted with 76 respondents within a mixed method study of Southeast Asian American adolescent and young adult drug users in urban Northern California, USA. We included the pile sort to clarify how respondents handled specific terms which we understood to be related to Ecstasy and methamphetamines. Results of the pile sort were analyzed using graphic layout algorithms as well as content analysis of pile labels. Similar to the national surveys, our respondents consistently differentiated Ecstasy terms from methamphetamine terms. We found high agreement between some specific local terms (thizz, crystal) and popular drug terms, while other terms thought to be mainstream (crank, speed) were reported as unknown by many respondents. In labeling piles, respondents created taxonomies based on consumption method (in particular, pill) as well as the social contexts of use. We conclude by proposing that divergences between drug terms utilized in survey research and those used by drug users may reflect two opposing tendencies: the tendency of survey researchers to utilize standardized language that constructs persons and experiences as relatively homogeneous, varying only within measurable degrees, and the tendency of drug users to utilize specialized language (argot) that reflects their understandings of their experiences as hybrid and diverse. The findings problematize the validity of drug terms and categories used in survey research.

Keywords: Asian American; Drug classification; Ecstasy; drug classification; methamphetamine; qualitative methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pile sort outcomes graphed
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahmad K. Asia grapples with spreading amphetamine abuse. Lancet. 2003;361(9372):1878–1879. - PubMed
    1. American Prosecutors Research Institute. The Drug Evaluation and Classification (DEC) Program; Targeting Hardcore and Impaired Drivers. Alexandria, VA: American Prosecutors Research Institute, National Traffic Law Center; 2004.
    1. Amodeo M, Robb N, Peou S, Tran H. Alcohol and other drug problems among Southeast Asians: Patterns of use and approaches to assessment and intervention. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly. 1997;15(3):63–77.
    1. Becker HS. Becoming a marihuana user. American Journal of Sociology. 1953;59(3):235–242.
    1. Becker HS. History, culture and subjective experience: An exploration of the social bases of drug-induced experiences. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1967;8(3):163–176. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources