Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct;19(4):529-36.
doi: 10.1007/s12298-013-0184-4.

Salicylic acid and salicylic acid sensitive and insensitive catalases in different genotypes of chickpea against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri

Affiliations

Salicylic acid and salicylic acid sensitive and insensitive catalases in different genotypes of chickpea against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri

S Gayatridevi et al. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Differential expression of catalase isozymes in different genotypes of chickpea resistant genotypes- A1, JG-315, JG-11, WR-315, R1-315, Vijaya, ICCV-15017, GBS-964, GBM-10, and susceptible genotypes- JG-62, MNK, ICCV-08321, ICCV-08311, KW-104, ICCV-08123, ICC-4951, ICC-11322, ICC-08116 for wilt disease caused by Fusarium oxysporum. f. sp. ciceri (Foc) was analyzed. Salicylic acid (SA) and H2O2 concentrations were determined in control as well as in plants infected with F. ciceri and found that the high and low levels of salicylic acid and H2O2 in resistant and susceptible genotypes of chickpea respectively. Catalase isozyme activities were detected in the gel and found that no induction of new catalases was observed in all the resistant genotypes and their some of the native catalase isozymes were inhibited; whereas, induction of multiple catalase isozymes was observed in all the screened susceptible genotypes and their activities were not inhibited upon Foc or SA treatments. The above results support the possible role of these isozymes as a marker to identify which genotype of chickpea is expressing systemic acquired resistance.

Keywords: Catalase; Chickpea; Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri; H2O2; Salicylic acid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Native gel stained for catalase activity from root and shoot extract of chickpea resistant genotypes JG-315 (1), JG-11(2), A-1 (3) and WR-315 (4), (A) control root; (B) control shoot: (C) SA treated root; (D) SA treated shoot; (E) pathogen infected root; (F) pathogen infected shoot; Equal amount of protein was loaded on gels (20 μg)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Native gel stained for catalase activity from root and shoot extract of chickpea susceptible genotypes: JG-62 (1), ICCV-08321 (2), ICCV-08311 (3) and MNK (4). (A) control root; (B) control shoot: (C) SA treated root; (D) SA treated shoot; (E) pathogen infected root; (F) pathogen infected shoot; Equal amount of protein was loaded on gels (20 μg). Arrows indicate induction of new isofoms of catalases

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barbehenn R, Dukatz C, Holt C, Reese AO, Salminen JP. Feeding on poplar leaves by caterpillars potentiates foliar peroxidase action in their guts and increase plant resistance. Oecologia. 2010;164:993–1004. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1733-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen Z, Klessig DF. Identification of a soluble salicylic acid binding protein that may function in signal transduction in the plant disease resistance response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:8179–8183. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.18.8179. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen Z, Riciglano JW, Klessig DF. Purification and characterization of a soluble salicylic acid binding protein from tobacco. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:9533–9537. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.20.9533. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dempsey DM, Klessig DF. Salicylic acid, active oxygen species and systemic acquired resistance in plants. Trends Cell Biol. 1994;4:334–338. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(94)90235-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dixon RA, Lamb CJ. Molecular communication in interaction between plants and microbial pathogens. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1990;41:339–367. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.41.060190.002011. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources