Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jan;29(1):98-105.
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.1.98. Epub 2013 Dec 26.

A randomized controlled trial of comparison on time and rate of cecal and termianl Ileal intubation according to adult-colonoscope length: intermediate versus long

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized controlled trial of comparison on time and rate of cecal and termianl Ileal intubation according to adult-colonoscope length: intermediate versus long

Kwang-Min Kim et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

For a complete colonoscopic examination, a high intubation rate and a short intubation time have been demanded to colonoscopists, if possible. The aim of the present study was to compare these examination parameters, intubation time and rate, according to the length of colonoscope. A total of 507 healthy Korean subjects were randomly assigned into two groups: intermediate length adult-colonoscope (n=254) and long length adult-colonoscope (n=253). There were significant differences in cecal intubation time and in terminal ileal intubation rate according to the length of the colonoscope. Time-to-cecal intubation was shorter for the intermediate-scope group than for the long-scope group (234.2 ± 115.0 sec vs 280.7 ± 135.0 sec, P < 0.001). However, the success rate of terminal ileal intubation was higher in the long-scope group than in the intermediate-scope group (95.3% vs 84.3%, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in other colonoscopic parameters between the two groups. The intermediate length adult-colonoscope decreased the time to reach the cecum, whereas the long-scope showed a success rate of terminal ileal intubation. These findings suggest that it is reasonable to prepare and use these two types of colonoscope appropriate to the needs of the patient and examination, instead of employing only one type of colonoscope.

Keywords: Colonoscope Length; Colonoscopy; Intubation Rate; Intubation Time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of study design. IBD, inflammatory bowel disease.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Serial photographs from the colonoscope during insertion into the anus shows the beginning of time-recording. (A) The initial red-out phenomenon is usually seen on the monitor immediately after the colonoscope is inserted into the anus. (B) After air insufflation, the anal lumen is distended and identified. (C) At this time, the stopwatch function of the colonoscopic equipment was activated by an assistant nurse. Yellow dotted box is the time measured by the colonoscopic stopwatch.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Colonoscopic landmarks in photographic documentation of complete cecal and terminal intubation. (A) Ileocecal valve (yellow arrow). (B) Appendiceal orifice (yellow arrow). (C) Terminal ileum. Villi were seen in the terminal ileum (water-filling method). (D) Terminal ileum. Villi were seen in the terminal ileum (narrow-band imaging method).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The plot of time to cecal intubation and ileal intubation by the number of cases. (A) Cecal intubation time. (B) Terminal ileal intubation time.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Comparison of cecal intubation time and terminal ileal intubation rate according to adult-colonoscope length (intermediate versus long). (A) Cecal intubation time. (B) Terminal ileal intubation rate. ILAC, intermediate length adult-colonoscope; LLAC, long length adult-colonoscpe; CIT, cecal intubation time; TIIR, terminal ileal intubation rate.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11–30. - PubMed
    1. Sung JJ, Lau JY, Goh KL, Leung WK Asia Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer. Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in Asia: implications for screening. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:871–876. - PubMed
    1. Jung KW, Park S, Kong HJ, Won YJ, Boo YK, Shin HR, Park EC, Lee JS. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality and survival in 2006-2007. J Korean Med Sci. 2010;25:1113–1121. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim YJ. What is a reasonable screening test for colorectal cancer. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26:375. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bertelson NL, Kalkbrenner KA, Merchea A, Dozois EJ, Landmann RG, De Petris G, Young-Fadok TM, Etzioni DA. Colectomy for endoscopically unresectable polyps: how often is it cancer? Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:1111–1116. - PubMed

Publication types