Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May 1;2(2):127-144.
doi: 10.14301/llcs.v2i2.118.

A comparison of response rates in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing and the Health and Retirement Study

Hayley Cheshire  1 , Mary Beth Ofstedal  2 , Shaun Scholes  3 , Mathis Schroeder  4
Affiliations

A comparison of response rates in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing and the Health and Retirement Study

Hayley Cheshire et al. Longit Life Course Stud. .

Abstract

Survey response rates are an important measure of the quality of a survey; this is true for both longitudinal and cross-sectional surveys. However, the concept of a response rate in the context of a panel survey is more complex than is the case for a cross-sectional survey. There are typically many different response rates that can be calculated for a panel survey, each of which may be relevant for a specific purpose. The main objective of our paper is to document and compare response rates for two long-term panel studies of ageing, the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) in the United States. To guide our selection and calculation of response rates for the two studies, we use a framework that was developed by Peter Lynn (2005) and present several different types of longitudinal response rates for the two surveys. We discuss similarities and differences in the study designs and protocols and how some of the differences affect comparisons of response rates across the two studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. The American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. 5. The American Association for Public Opinion Research; Lenexa, Kansas: 2008.
    1. Couper MP, Ofstedal MB. Keeping in contact with mobile sample members. In: Lynn P, editor. Methodology of longitudinal surveys. Wiley; New York: 2009.
    1. Erens B, Primatesta P, editors. Health Survey for England 1998, Vol. 2: methodology and documentation. The Stationery Office; London: 1999. ( http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/doh/survey98/hse-08...)
    1. Erens B, Primatesta P, Prior G, editors. Health Survey for England. The Health of Minority Ethnic Groups 1999, Vol. 2: methodology and documentation. The Stationery Office; London: 2001. ( http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/doh/survey99/hse99-...)
    1. Groves RM, Couper MP. Non-response in household interview surveys. John Wiley and Sons; New York: 1998.

LinkOut - more resources