Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Feb;7(1):25-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11832-012-0459-2. Epub 2012 Dec 25.

Classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)

Affiliations
Review

Classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)

Dror Ovadia. J Child Orthop. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

In 1983 Howard King presented his classification system for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) based on the experience with Harrington rod instrumentation. Curves were divided into five types and guidelines and recommendations for which levels should be instrumented were given to preserve motion as much as possible. As segmental instrumentation systems began to gain favor over the Harrington rods this system failed and led to the development of a new classification system which was presented by Lawrence Lenke in 2001. In order to define a curve type by the Lenke classification, one must identify the curve type, the lumbar modifier and, for the first time in any classification system for scoliosis, the sagittal profile was also included. The Lenke classification showed higher inter and intra-reliability compared to the King classification. It also provided a better and more reliable tool to assist surgeons in choosing the best method of treatment for each curve pattern. Although the Lenke classification is more comprehensive and reliable than the King classification it is still far from perfect. It does not address the rotational component of the deformity. New technologies which provide three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the spine may serve as a basis for a truly 3D classification of scoliosis and for new therapeutic concepts.

Keywords: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Classification; King; Lenke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The King classification published 1983 [1]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The Lenke classification published 2001 [7]

References

    1. King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, Winter RB. The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:1302–1313. - PubMed
    1. Richards BS. Lumbar curve response in type II idiopathic scoliosis after posterior instrumentation of the thoracic curve. Spine. 1992;17:S282–S286. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199208001-00012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roye DP Jr, Farcy JP, Rickert JB, Godfried D (1992) Results of spinal instrumentation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by King type. Spine 17:S270–S273 - PubMed
    1. Knapp DR, Jr, Price CT, Jones ET, Coonrad RW, Flynn JC. Choosing fusion levels in progressive thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1992;17:1159–1165. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199210000-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cummings RJ, Loveless EA, Campbell J, Samelson S, Mazur JM. Inter-observer reliability and intra-observer reproducibility of the system of King et al. for the classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1107–1111. - PubMed