Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan 6:3:325.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00325.

What Factors Impact upon a Woman's Decision to Undertake Genetic Cancer Testing?

Affiliations

What Factors Impact upon a Woman's Decision to Undertake Genetic Cancer Testing?

Julie A Quinlivan et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Introduction: The advent of human genome project has lead to genetic tests that identify high-risk states for certain cancers. Many are privately marketed on the Internet. Despite the availability of tests, limited data has evaluated factors that lead to test uptake. The aim of the present study was to explore the attitudes of a cohort of new mothers toward uptake of a genetic cancer test with a 50% predictive value of cancer.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was undertaken. The project targeted women who had recently given birth at an Australian tertiary referral hospital. Women were asked about a theoretical blood test that detected an increased risk for the development of cancer. Attitudes and knowledge questionnaires were completed.

Results: Of 232 consecutive women approached, 32 declined, giving a response rate of 86.2%. Only 63 (31.5%) women stated they would have the test. Absence of religious belief, higher level of education, better knowledge of terms used in genetics, an absence of concern over emotional, employment, and insurance discrimination, and previous acceptance of Down syndrome screening in pregnancy were each associated with significantly higher rate of test uptake in univariate analysis (all p < 0.03). In multivariate analysis, a lack of concern over discrimination and a history of having accepted Down syndrome screening in the previous pregnancy remained significantly associated with test uptake (all p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Concern over discrimination and having made a prior decision to have genetic testing were the principal factors associated with decision-making.

Keywords: breast cancer; discrimination; education; ethics; genetic cancer screening; pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Codori AM, Petersen GM, Miglioretti DL, Larkin EK, Bushey MT, Young C, et al. Attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing: factors predicting test uptake. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (1999) 8:345–51 - PubMed
    1. Evans AM, Love RR, Meyerowitz BE, Leventhal H, Nerenz DR. Factors associated with active participation in a cancer prevention clinic. Prev Med (1985) 14:358–7110.1016/0091-7435(85)90062-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bostick RM, Sprafka JM, Virnig BA, Potter JD. Predictors of cancer prevention attitudes and participation in cancer screening examinations. Prev Med (1994) 23:816–2610.1006/pmed.1994.1139 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Friedman LC, Webb JA, Bruce S, Weinberg AD, Cooper HP. Skin cancer prevention and early detection intentions and behavior. Am J Prev Med (1995) 11:59–65 - PubMed
    1. Lloyd S, Watson M, Waites B, Meyer L, Eeles R, Ebbs S, et al. Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counseling. Br J Cancer (1996) 74:482–710.1038/bjc.1996.387 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources