Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2014 Jan 16;9(1):2.
doi: 10.1186/1746-4358-9-2.

Regulating fatty acids in infant formula: critical assessment of U.S. policies and practices

Affiliations
Editorial

Regulating fatty acids in infant formula: critical assessment of U.S. policies and practices

George Kent. Int Breastfeed J. .

Abstract

Background: Fatty acids in breast-milk such as docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid, commonly known as DHA and ARA, contribute to the healthy development of children in various ways. However, the manufactured versions that are added to infant formula might not have the same health benefits as those in breast-milk. There is evidence that the manufactured additives might cause harm to infants' health, and they might lead to unwarranted increases in the cost of infant formula.The addition of such fatty acids to infant formula needs to be regulated. In the U.S., the Food and Drug Administration has primary responsibility for regulating the composition of infant formula. The central purpose of this study is to assess the FDA's efforts with regard to the regulation of fatty acids in infant formula.

Methods: This study is based on critical analysis of policies and practices described in publicly available documents of the FDA, the manufacturers of fatty acids, and other relevant organizations. The broad framework for this work was set out by the author in his book on Regulating Infant Formula, published in 2011.

Results: The FDA does not assess the safety or the health impacts of fatty acid additives to infant formula before they are marketed, and there is no systematic assessment after marketing is underway. Rather than making its own independent assessments, the FDA accepts the manufacturers' claims regarding their products' safety and effectiveness.

Conclusions: The FDA is not adequately regulating the use of fatty acid additives to infant formula. This results in exposure of infants to potential risks. Adverse reactions are already on record. Also, the additives have led to increasing costs of infant formula despite the lack of proven benefits to normal, full term infants. There is a need for more effective regulation of DHA and ARA additives to infant formula.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brody JE. Experts disagree on adding fatty acid to infant formula. New York Times. 1996. [ http://www.nytimes.com/1996/11/06/us/experts-disagree-on-adding-fatty-ac...]
    1. Guidice C. Harmonisation: Mercosur gets to work on nutrition claims. EAS Strateg Advice: Europe. 2012. [ http://www.eas.eu/News_Item/921]
    1. Astley M. ISO to cooperate with AOAC on infant formula standards. Nutra Ingredients.com. 2012. [ http://www.nutraingredients.com/Regulation/ISO-to-cooperate-with-AOAC-on...]
    1. GOED. Global Organization for EPA and DHA Omega-3. 2012. Website [ http://www.goedomega3.com]
    1. Codex Alimentarius Commission. Standard for Infant Formula and Formulas for Special Medical Purposes Intended for Infants. CODEX STAN 72–1981. (Formerly CAC/RS 72–1972. Adopted as a world-wide Standard 1981. Amended 1983, 1985, 1987. Revision 2007. Amended 2011). [ http://www.codexalimentarius.org]

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources