Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb 15;171(3):423-30.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.12.094. Epub 2014 Jan 4.

Comprehensive analysis of intravascular ultrasound and angiographic morphology of culprit lesions between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

Affiliations

Comprehensive analysis of intravascular ultrasound and angiographic morphology of culprit lesions between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

Naoko Takaoka et al. Int J Cardiol. .

Abstract

Background: Some plaques lead to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), whereas others cause non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS). We used angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to investigate the difference of culprit lesion morphologies in ACS.

Methods: Consecutive 158 ACS patients whose culprit lesions were imaged by preintervention IVUS were enrolled (STEMI=81; NSTEACS=77). IVUS and angiographic findings of the culprit lesions, and clinical characteristics were compared between the groups.

Results: There were no significant differences in patients' characteristics except for lower rate of statin use in patients with STEMI (20% vs 44%, p=0.001). Although angiographic complex culprit morphology (Ambrose classification) and thrombus were more common in STEMI than in NSTEACS (84% vs 62%, p=0.002; 51% vs 5%, p<0.0001, respectively), SYNTAX score was lower in STEMI (8.6 ± 5.4 vs 11.5 ± 7.1, p=0.01). In patients with STEMI, culprit echogenicity was more hypoechoic (64% vs 40%, p=0.01), and the incidence of plaque rupture, attenuation and "microcalcification" were significantly higher (56% vs 17%, p<0.0001; 85% vs 69%, p=0.01; 77% vs 61%, p=0.04, respectively). Furthermore, the maximum area of ruptured cavity, echolucent zone and arc of microcalcification were significantly greater in STEMI compared with NSTEACS (1.80 ± 0.99 mm(2) vs 1.13 ± 0.86 mm(2), p=0.006; 1.52 ± 0.74 mm(2) vs 1.21 ± 0.81 mm(2), p=0.004; 99.9 ± 54.6° vs 77.4 ± 51.2°, p=0.01, respectively). Quantitative IVUS analysis showed that vessel and plaque area were significantly larger at minimum lumen area site (16.6 ± 5.4 mm(2) vs 14.2 ± 5.5 mm(2), p=0.003; 13.9 ± 5.1 mm(2) vs 11.6 ± 5.2 mm(2), p=0.003, respectively).

Conclusion: Morphological feature (outward vessel remodeling, plaque buildup and IVUS vulnerability of culprit lesions) might relate to clinical presentation in patients with ACS.

Keywords: Catheterization; Imaging; Myocardial infarction; Plaque; Ultrasonics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources