Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;23(1):4-15.
doi: 10.1177/0963662513518154.

Why should we promote public engagement with science?

Jack Stilgoe  1 , Simon J Lock, James Wilsdon
Affiliations

Why should we promote public engagement with science?

Jack Stilgoe et al. Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

This introductory essay looks back on the two decades since the journal Public Understanding of Science was launched. Drawing on the invited commentaries in this special issue, we can see narratives of continuity and change around the practice and politics of public engagement with science. Public engagement would seem to be a necessary but insufficient part of opening up science and its governance. Those of us who have been involved in advocating, conducting and evaluating public engagement practice could be accused of over-promising. If we, as social scientists, are going to continue a normative commitment to the idea of public engagement, we should therefore develop new lines of argument and analysis. Our support for the idea of public engagement needs qualifying, as part of a broader, more ambitious interest in the idea of publicly engaged science.

Keywords: governance; public dialogue; public engagement.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Barben D, Fisher E, Selin C, Guston D. (2008) Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: Foresight, engagement, and integration. In: Hackett E, Lynch M, Wajcman J. (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, third edition Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 979–1000.
    1. Barnett J, Burningham K, Walker G, Cass N. (2012) Imagined publics and engagement around renewable energy technologies in the UK. Public Understanding of Science 21(1): 36–50.
    1. Bauer MW, Allum N, Miller S. (2007) What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science 16(1): 79–95.
    1. Burchell K, Franklin S, Holden K. (2009) Public Culture as Professional Science: Final Report of the ScoPE Project (Scientists on Public Engagement: From Communication to Deliberation?). 18 September London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
    1. Callon M, Lascoumes P, Barthe Y. (2009) Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.