Long term duration of protective effect for HPV negative women: follow-up of primary HPV screening randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 24435414
- PMCID: PMC3898575
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g130
Long term duration of protective effect for HPV negative women: follow-up of primary HPV screening randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Objectives: To assess whether the increased sensitivity of screening for human papillomavirus (HPV) may represent overdiagnosis and to compare the long term duration of protective effect against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) in HPV based and cytology based screening.
Design: 13 year follow-up of the Swedescreen randomised controlled trial of primary HPV screening.
Setting: Organised cervical screening programme in Sweden.
Participants: 12,527 women aged 32-38 attending organised screening were enrolled and randomised to HPV and cytology double testing (intervention arm, n=6257) or to cytology only, with samples frozen for future HPV testing (control arm, n=6270).
Main outcome measures: Cumulative incidence of CIN2+ and CIN3+ (Kaplan Meier curves). Longitudinal test characteristics were calculated for cytology only, HPV testing only, and cytology and HPV testing combined, adjusting for censoring.
Results: The increased detection of CIN2+ in the intervention arm decreased over time. After six years, the cumulative incidence of CIN3+ was similar in both trial arms, and after 11 years the cumulative incidence of CIN2+ became similar in both arms. The longitudinal sensitivity of cytology for CIN2+ in the control arm at three years was similar to the sensitivity of HPV testing in the intervention arm at five years of follow-up: 85.94% (95% confidence interval 76.85% to 91.84%) v 86.40% (79.21% to 91.37%). The sensitivity of HPV screening for CIN3+after five years was 89.34% (80.10% to 94.58%) and for cytology after three years was 92.02% (80.59% to 96.97%).
Conclusions: Over long term follow-up, the cumulative incidence of CIN2+ was the same for HPV screening and for cytology, implying that the increased sensitivity of HPV screening for CIN2+ reflects earlier detection rather than overdiagnosis. The low long term risks of CIN3+ among women who tested negative in HPV screening, support screening intervals of five years for such women.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00479375.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at
Figures



Comment in
-
More education is needed before we burden women with their HPV status.BMJ. 2014 Feb 12;348:g1443. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1443. BMJ. 2014. PMID: 24523378 No abstract available.
-
The difference in sensitivity between HPV testing and cytology for detecting current and future CIN2+ increases over time.Evid Based Med. 2014 Oct;19(5):184. doi: 10.1136/eb-2014-101757. Epub 2014 May 1. Evid Based Med. 2014. PMID: 24785468 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.Health Technol Assess. 2014 Apr;18(23):1-196. doi: 10.3310/hta18230. Health Technol Assess. 2014. PMID: 24762804 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Detection rates of precancerous and cancerous cervical lesions within one screening round of primary human papillomavirus DNA testing: prospective randomised trial in Finland.BMJ. 2012 Nov 29;345:e7789. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7789. BMJ. 2012. PMID: 23197596 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of primary HPV-based cervical screening among older women: Long-term follow-up of a randomized healthcare policy trial in Sweden.PLoS Med. 2024 Dec 19;21(12):e1004505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004505. eCollection 2024 Dec. PLoS Med. 2024. PMID: 39700313 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis.Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):172-83. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70570-9. Epub 2014 Jan 14. Lancet Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24433684 Review.
-
Accuracy and effectiveness of HPV mRNA testing in cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jul;23(7):950-960. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00294-7. Epub 2022 Jun 13. Lancet Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35709810
Cited by
-
Analytical Evaluation of the Human Papillomavirus HPV DNA Array E1-Based Genotyping Assay.Intervirology. 2019;62(3-4):124-133. doi: 10.1159/000502207. Epub 2019 Sep 5. Intervirology. 2019. PMID: 31487743 Free PMC article.
-
Utilization and outcomes of serial cervical cancer screening in a National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) in a non-Medicaid expansion state.Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Apr;36(4):409-420. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01948-3. Epub 2024 Dec 16. Cancer Causes Control. 2025. PMID: 39681764 Free PMC article.
-
Protocol for Compass: a randomised controlled trial of primary HPV testing versus cytology screening for cervical cancer in HPV-unvaccinated and vaccinated women aged 25-69 years living in Australia.BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):e016700. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016700. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 29374658 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the Roche cobas® 4800 and Digene Hybrid Capture® 2 HPV tests for primary cervical cancer screening in the HPV FOCAL trial.BMC Cancer. 2015 Dec 16;15:968. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1959-5. BMC Cancer. 2015. PMID: 26674353 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Organized primary human papillomavirus-based cervical screening: A randomized healthcare policy trial.PLoS Med. 2021 Aug 23;18(8):e1003748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003748. eCollection 2021 Aug. PLoS Med. 2021. PMID: 34424907 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Forman D, de Martel C, Lacey CJ, Soerjomataram I, Lortet-Tieulent J, Bruni L, et al. Global burden of human papillomavirus and related diseases. Vaccine 2012;30(Suppl 5):F12-23. - PubMed
-
- Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer JA, Shah KV, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 1999;189:12-9. - PubMed
-
- Arbyn M, Ronco G, Anttila A, Meijer CJ, Poljak M, Ogilvie G, et al. Evidence regarding human papillomavirus testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer. Vaccine 2012;30(Suppl 5):F88-99. - PubMed
-
- Naucler P, Ryd W, Tornberg S, Strand A, Wadell G, Elfgren K, et al. Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1589-97. - PubMed
-
- Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F, Confortini M, Dalla Palma P, Del Mistro A, et al. Results at recruitment from a randomized controlled trial comparing human papillomavirus testing alone with conventional cytology as the primary cervical cancer screening test. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:492-501. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical