Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jan 16:348:g130.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.g130.

Long term duration of protective effect for HPV negative women: follow-up of primary HPV screening randomised controlled trial

K Miriam Elfström  1 , Vitaly Smelov, Anna L V Johansson, Carina Eklund, Pontus Nauclér, Lisen Arnheim-Dahlström, Joakim Dillner
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Long term duration of protective effect for HPV negative women: follow-up of primary HPV screening randomised controlled trial

K Miriam Elfström et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To assess whether the increased sensitivity of screening for human papillomavirus (HPV) may represent overdiagnosis and to compare the long term duration of protective effect against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) in HPV based and cytology based screening.

Design: 13 year follow-up of the Swedescreen randomised controlled trial of primary HPV screening.

Setting: Organised cervical screening programme in Sweden.

Participants: 12,527 women aged 32-38 attending organised screening were enrolled and randomised to HPV and cytology double testing (intervention arm, n=6257) or to cytology only, with samples frozen for future HPV testing (control arm, n=6270).

Main outcome measures: Cumulative incidence of CIN2+ and CIN3+ (Kaplan Meier curves). Longitudinal test characteristics were calculated for cytology only, HPV testing only, and cytology and HPV testing combined, adjusting for censoring.

Results: The increased detection of CIN2+ in the intervention arm decreased over time. After six years, the cumulative incidence of CIN3+ was similar in both trial arms, and after 11 years the cumulative incidence of CIN2+ became similar in both arms. The longitudinal sensitivity of cytology for CIN2+ in the control arm at three years was similar to the sensitivity of HPV testing in the intervention arm at five years of follow-up: 85.94% (95% confidence interval 76.85% to 91.84%) v 86.40% (79.21% to 91.37%). The sensitivity of HPV screening for CIN3+after five years was 89.34% (80.10% to 94.58%) and for cytology after three years was 92.02% (80.59% to 96.97%).

Conclusions: Over long term follow-up, the cumulative incidence of CIN2+ was the same for HPV screening and for cytology, implying that the increased sensitivity of HPV screening for CIN2+ reflects earlier detection rather than overdiagnosis. The low long term risks of CIN3+ among women who tested negative in HPV screening, support screening intervals of five years for such women.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00479375.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and claim no conflict of interest related to the submitted work. JD has received grants from Merck/SPMSD for unconditional studies and LAD has received grants from Merck/SPMSD and GlaxoSmithKline for unconditional studies. No other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

None
Fig 1 Study population and analyses by group. HPV=human papillomavirus
None
Fig 2 Cumulative incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) over 13 years of follow-up by study arm and baseline test result (test result groups not mutually exclusive). HPV=human papillomavirus
None
Fig 3 Cumulative incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) over 13 years of follow-up by study arm and baseline test result (test result groups not mutually exclusive). HPV=human papillomavirus
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Forman D, de Martel C, Lacey CJ, Soerjomataram I, Lortet-Tieulent J, Bruni L, et al. Global burden of human papillomavirus and related diseases. Vaccine 2012;30(Suppl 5):F12-23. - PubMed
    1. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer JA, Shah KV, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 1999;189:12-9. - PubMed
    1. Arbyn M, Ronco G, Anttila A, Meijer CJ, Poljak M, Ogilvie G, et al. Evidence regarding human papillomavirus testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer. Vaccine 2012;30(Suppl 5):F88-99. - PubMed
    1. Naucler P, Ryd W, Tornberg S, Strand A, Wadell G, Elfgren K, et al. Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1589-97. - PubMed
    1. Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F, Confortini M, Dalla Palma P, Del Mistro A, et al. Results at recruitment from a randomized controlled trial comparing human papillomavirus testing alone with conventional cytology as the primary cervical cancer screening test. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:492-501. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data