Analysis of variation in charges and prices paid for vaginal and caesarean section births: a cross-sectional study
- PMID: 24435892
- PMCID: PMC3902513
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004017
Analysis of variation in charges and prices paid for vaginal and caesarean section births: a cross-sectional study
Abstract
Objective: To examine the between-hospital variation of charges and discounted prices for uncomplicated vaginal and caesarean section deliveries, and to determine the institutional and market-level characteristics that influence adjusted charges.
Design, setting and participants: Using data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD), we conducted a cross-sectional study of all privately insured patients admitted to California hospitals in 2011 for uncomplicated vaginal delivery (diagnosis-related group (DRG) 775) or uncomplicated caesarean section (DRG 766).
Outcome measures: Hospital charges and discounted prices adjusted for each patient's clinical and demographic characteristics.
Results: We analysed 76 766 vaginal deliveries and 32 660 caesarean sections in California in 2011. After adjusting for patient demographic and clinical characteristics, we found that the average California woman could be charged as little as US$3296 or as much as US$37 227 for a vaginal delivery, and US$8312-US$70 908 for a caesarean section depending on which hospital she was admitted to. The discounted prices were, on an average, 37% of the charges. We found that hospitals in markets with middling competition had significantly lower adjusted charges for vaginal deliveries, while hospitals with higher wage indices and casemixes, as well as for-profit hospitals, had higher adjusted charges. Hospitals in markets with higher uninsurance rates charged significantly less for caesarean sections, while for-profit hospitals and hospitals with higher wage indices charged more. However, the institutional and market-level factors included in our models explained only 35-36% of the between-hospital variation in charges.
Conclusions: These results indicate that charges and discounted prices for two common, relatively homogeneous diagnosis groups-uncomplicated vaginal delivery and caesarean section-vary widely between hospitals and are not well explained by observable patient or hospital characteristics.
Keywords: HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENT; OBSTETRICS.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A cross-sectional analysis of variation in charges and prices across California for percutaneous coronary intervention.PLoS One. 2014 Aug 4;9(8):e103829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103829. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25089905 Free PMC article.
-
Costs of vaginal delivery and Caesarean section at a tertiary level public hospital in Islamabad, Pakistan.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Jan 20;10:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-2. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010. PMID: 20085662 Free PMC article.
-
Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Feb;13(1):16-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00690.x. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007. PMID: 17286718
-
Caesarean section rates across Europe and its impact on specialist training in Obstetrics: A qualitative review by the Standing Committee of Hospital Visiting Programme for Training Recognition of the European Board and College of the Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG).Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025 Jan;304:77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.10.044. Epub 2024 Oct 28. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025. PMID: 39591842 Review.
-
Caesarean sections in teaching hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis of hospitals in 22 countries.BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 28;11(1):e042076. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042076. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 33509847 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Caesarean sections and private insurance: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e016600. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016600. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28827257 Free PMC article.
-
The Annual Economic Burden of Uterine Fibroids in the United States (2010 Versus 2022): A Comparative Cost-Analysis.Reprod Sci. 2024 Dec;31(12):3743-3756. doi: 10.1007/s43032-024-01727-0. Epub 2024 Oct 25. Reprod Sci. 2024. PMID: 39455488
-
Inpatient Hospital Charge Variability of U.S. Hospitals.J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov;30(11):1627-32. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3352-0. Epub 2015 May 1. J Gen Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 25931006 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiovascular health in young and middle adulthood and medical care utilization and costs at older age - The Chicago Heart Association Detection Project Industry (CHA).Prev Med. 2019 Feb;119:87-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.12.024. Epub 2018 Dec 28. Prev Med. 2019. PMID: 30594534 Free PMC article.
-
Caesarean Section Rates and Activity-Based Funding in Northern Norway: A Model-Based Study Using the World Health Organization's Recommendation.Obstet Gynecol Int. 2018 Jul 16;2018:6764258. doi: 10.1155/2018/6764258. eCollection 2018. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2018. PMID: 30116268 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Office of the Actuary National Health Expenditure Projections 2011–2021: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2011
-
- Government Accountability Office (GAO) Meaningful price information is difficult for consumers to obtain prior to receiving care. GAO-11-791, 2011
-
- Truffer CJ, Keehan S, Smith S, et al. Health spending projections through 2019: the recession's impact continues. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:522–9 - PubMed
-
- The Kaiser Family Foundation, Health Research & Educational Trust Employer Health Benefits 2012 Annual Survey, 2012
-
- Robinson JC, Ginsburg PB. Consumer-driven health care: promise and performance. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:w272–81 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical