Training and Maintaining System-Wide Reliability in Outcome Management
- PMID: 24436627
- PMCID: PMC3889818
- DOI: 10.1007/s10826-012-9694-x
Training and Maintaining System-Wide Reliability in Outcome Management
Abstract
The Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS) is widely used for outcome management, for providing real time client and program level data, and the monitoring of evidence-based practices. Methods of reliability training and the assessment of rater drift are critical for service decision-making within organizations and systems of care. We assessed two approaches for CAFAS training: external technical assistance and internal technical assistance. To this end, we sampled 315 practitioners trained by external technical assistance approach from 2,344 Ontario practitioners who had achieved reliability on the CAFAS. To assess the internal technical assistance approach as a reliable alternative training method, 140 practitioners trained internally were selected from the same pool of certified raters. Reliabilities were high for both practitioners trained by external technical assistance and internal technical assistance approaches (.909-.995, .915-.997, respectively). 1 and 3-year estimates showed some drift on several scales. High and consistent reliabilities over time and training method has implications for CAFAS training of behavioral health care practitioners, and the maintenance of CAFAS as a global outcome management tool in systems of care.
Keywords: CAFAS; Outcome management; Rater drift; Rater reliability; Train-the-trainer.
Similar articles
-
A feasibility study to assess service providers' perspectives regarding the use of the child and adolescent functional assessment scale in Ontario.J Behav Health Serv Res. 2005 Jan-Mar;32(1):105-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02287332. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2005. PMID: 15632802
-
The Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS): review and current status.Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2001 Mar;4(1):63-84. doi: 10.1023/a:1009528727345. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2001. PMID: 11388564
-
Are CAFAS subscales and item weights valid? A preliminary investigation of the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale.Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006 Nov;33(6):682-95. doi: 10.1007/s10488-006-0052-4. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006. PMID: 16775756
-
Reliability of Observational Assessment Methods for Outcome-based Assessment of Surgical Skill: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.J Surg Educ. 2020 Jan-Feb;77(1):189-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Aug 20. J Surg Educ. 2020. PMID: 31444148
-
Interrater reliability in clinical trials of depressive disorders.Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;159(9):1598-600. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1598. Am J Psychiatry. 2002. PMID: 12202285 Review.
References
-
- Accreditation Working Group, Children’s Mental Health Ontario . BCFPI and CAFAS: Guidelines for use of the measurement tools in accreditation. Toronto: Author; 2004.
-
- Barwick MA, Boydell KM, Omrin C. A knowledge transfer infrastructure for children’s mental health in Ontario: Building capacity for research and practice. Toronto, ON: The Hospital for Sick Children; 2002.
-
- Barwick MA, Schmidt J, Hodges K. Culturally competent evaluation: Clinical considerations for rating The Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale with Aboriginal children and youth. Toronto, ON: The Hospital for Sick Children; 2004.
-
- Boydell KM, Barwick MA, Ferguson HB, Haines R. A feasibility study to assess service providers’ perspectives regarding use of The Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale in Ontario. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research. 2004;32(1):105–109. doi: 10.1007/BF02287332. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources