Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jan-Feb;12(1):8-16.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1591.

Practice facilitation to improve diabetes care in primary care: a report from the EPIC randomized clinical trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Practice facilitation to improve diabetes care in primary care: a report from the EPIC randomized clinical trial

W Perry Dickinson et al. Ann Fam Med. 2014 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated 3 approaches for implementing the Chronic Care Model to improve diabetes care: (1) practice facilitation over 6 months using a reflective adaptive process (RAP) approach; (2) practice facilitation for up to 18 months using a continuous quality improvement (CQI) approach; and (3) providing self-directed (SD) practices with model information and resources, without facilitation.

Methods: We conducted a cluster-randomized trial, called Enhancing Practice, Improving Care (EPIC), that compared these approaches among 40 small to midsized primary care practices. At baseline and 9 months and 18 months after enrollment, we assessed practice diabetes quality measures from chart audits and Practice Culture Assessment scores from clinician and staff surveys.

Results: Although measures of the quality of diabetes care improved in all 3 groups (all P <.05), improvement was greater in CQI practices compared with both SD practices (P <.0001) and RAP practices (P <.0001); additionally, improvement was greater in SD practices compared with RAP practices (P <.05). In RAP practices, Change Culture scores showed a trend toward improvement at 9 months (P = .07) but decreased below baseline at 18 months (P <.05), while Work Culture scores decreased from 9 to 18 months (P <.05). Both scores were stable over time in SD and CQI practices.

Conclusions: Traditional CQI interventions are effective at improving measures of the quality of diabetes care, but may not improve practice change and work culture. Short-term practice facilitation based on RAP principles produced less improvement in quality measures than CQI or SD interventions and also did not produce sustained improvements in practice culture.

Keywords: diabetes mellitus; family medicine; patient-centered medical home; practice facilitation; practice-based research; primary health care; quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram. CONSORT = Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; CQI = continuous quality improvement; RAP = reflective adaptive process; SD = self-directed. Notes: 2 RAP practices and 2 CQI practices had limited or no active participation after baseline. Clinicians surveyed using the Assessment of Clinician Diabetes Management included all physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. Clinicians and staff surveyed using the Practice Culture Assessment included everyone in any role in the practice.

References

    1. Grundy P, Hagan KR, Hansen JC, Grumbach K. The multi-stakeholder movement for primary care renewal and reform. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(5):791–798 - PubMed
    1. Bodenheimer T, Pham HH. Primary care: current problems and proposed solutions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(5):799–805 - PubMed
    1. Rosenthal TC. The medical home: growing evidence to support a new approach to primary care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2008;21(5):427–440 - PubMed
    1. Fisher ES. Building a medical neighborhood for the medical home. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(12):1202–1205 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457–502 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms