Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb;32(2):187-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.10.009.

Integrating genomics into clinical oncology: ethical and social challenges from proponents of personalized medicine

Affiliations

Integrating genomics into clinical oncology: ethical and social challenges from proponents of personalized medicine

Michelle L McGowan et al. Urol Oncol. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: The use of molecular tools to individualize health care, predict appropriate therapies, and prevent adverse health outcomes has gained significant traction in the field of oncology under the banner of "personalized medicine" (PM). Enthusiasm for PM in oncology has been fueled by success stories of targeted treatments for a variety of cancers based on their molecular profiles. Though these are clear indications of optimism for PM, little is known about the ethical and social implications of personalized approaches in clinical oncology.

Objective: The objective of this study is to assess how a range of stakeholders engaged in promoting, monitoring, and providing PM understand the challenges of integrating genomic testing and targeted therapies into clinical oncology.

Methods and materials: The study involved the analysis of in-depth interviews with 117 stakeholders whose experiences and perspectives on PM span a wide variety of institutional and professional settings.

Results: Despite their considerable enthusiasm for this shift, promoters, monitors, and providers of PM identified 4 domains that provoke heightened ethical and social concerns: (1) informed consent for cancer genomic testing, (2) privacy, confidentiality, and disclosure of genomic test results, (3) access to genomic testing and targeted therapies in oncology, and (4) the costs of scaling up pharmacogenomic testing and targeted cancer therapies.

Conclusions: These specific concerns are not unique to oncology, or even genomics. However, those most invested in the success of PM view oncologists' responses to these challenges as precedent setting because oncology is farther along the path of clinical integration of genomic technologies than other fields of medicine. This study illustrates that the rapid emergence of PM approaches in clinical oncology provides a crucial lens for identifying and managing potential frictions and pitfalls that emerge as health care paradigms shift in these directions.

Keywords: Cancer genomics; Ethics; Genomic testing; Personalized medicine; Social implications; Targeted therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Juengst ET, Settersten RA, Fishman JR, McGowan ML. After the revolution? Ethical and social challenges in ‘personalized genomic medicine’. Personalized Medicine. 2012;9:429–439. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hamburg MA, Collins FS. The Path to Personalized Medicine. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;363:301–304. - PubMed
    1. Raman G, Wallace B, Patel K, et al. Update on Horizon Scans of Genetic Tests Currently Available for Clinical Use in Cancers. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services; 2011. - PubMed
    1. Schilsky RL. Personalized medicine in oncology: the future is now. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:363–366. - PubMed
    1. Weldon CB, Trosman JR, Gradishar WJ, et al. Barriers to the use of personalized medicine in breast cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2012;8:e24–31. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types