Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar;174(3):370-7.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13315.

Scope and outcomes of surrogate decision making among hospitalized older adults

Affiliations

Scope and outcomes of surrogate decision making among hospitalized older adults

Alexia M Torke et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Importance: Hospitalized older adults often lack decisional capacity, but outside of the intensive care unit and end-of-life care settings, little is known about the frequency of decision making by family members or other surrogates or its implications for hospital care.

Objective: To describe the scope of surrogate decision making, the hospital course, and outcomes for older adults.

Design, setting, and participants: Prospective, observational study conducted in medicine and medical intensive care unit services of 2 hospitals in 1 Midwestern city in 1083 hospitalized older adults identified by their physicians as requiring major medical decisions.

Main outcomes and measures: Clinical characteristics, hospital outcomes, nature of major medical decisions, and surrogate involvement.

Results: According to physician reports, at 48 hours of hospitalization, 47.4% (95% CI, 44.4%-50.4%) of older adults required at least some surrogate involvement, including 23.0% (20.6%-25.6%) with all decisions made by a surrogate. Among patients who required a surrogate for at least 1 decision within 48 hours, 57.2% required decisions about life-sustaining care (mostly addressing code status), 48.6% about procedures and operations, and 46.9% about discharge planning. Patients who needed a surrogate experienced a more complex hospital course with greater use of ventilators (2.5% of patients who made decisions and 13.2% of patients who required any surrogate decisions; P < .001), artificial nutrition (1.7% of patients and 14.4% of surrogates; P < .001), and length of stay (median, 6 days for patients and 7 days for surrogates; P < .001). They were more likely to be discharged to an extended-care facility (21.2% with patient decisions and 40.9% with surrogate decisions; P < .001) and had higher hospital mortality (0.0% patients and 5.9% surrogates; P < .001). Most surrogates were daughters (58.9%), sons (25.0%), or spouses (20.6%). Overall, only 7.4% had a living will and 25.0% had a health care representative document in the medical record.

Conclusions and relevance: Surrogate decision making occurs for nearly half of hospitalized older adults and includes both complete decision making by the surrogate and joint decision making by the patient and surrogate. Surrogates commonly face a broad range of decisions in the intensive care unit and the hospital ward setting. Hospital functions should be redesigned to account for the large and growing role of surrogates, supporting them as they make health care decisions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Enrollment of Study Participants
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of Patients Requiring Surrogate Decision Making, by Admission Location

Comment in

References

    1. Alzheimer’s Association. Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures. Washington, D.C: Alzheimer’s Association; 2011. - PubMed
    1. Inouye SK, Schlesinger MJ, Lydon TJ. Delirium: a symptom of how hospital care is failing older persons and a window to improve quality of hospital care. American Journal of Medicine. 1999 May;106(5):565–573. - PubMed
    1. Sessums LL, Zembrzuska H, Jackson JL. Does this patient have medical decision-making capacity? JAMA. 2011 Jul 27;306(4):420–427. - PubMed
    1. Raymont V, Bingley W, Buchanan A, et al. Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2004 Oct 16–22;364(9443):1421–1427. - PubMed
    1. Boustani M, Baker MS, NC, et al. Impact and recognition of cognitive impairment among hospitalized elders. J Hospital Med. 2010;5(2):69–75. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types