Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Sep;22(9):1124-30.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.304. Epub 2014 Jan 22.

Coverage and efficiency in current SNP chips

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Coverage and efficiency in current SNP chips

Ngoc-Thuy Ha et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

To answer the question as to which commercial high-density SNP chip covers most of the human genome given a fixed budget, we compared the performance of 12 chips of different sizes released by Affymetrix and Illumina for the European, Asian, and African populations. These include Affymetrix' relatively new population-optimized arrays, whose SNP sets are each tailored toward a specific ethnicity. Our evaluation of the chips included the use of two measures, efficiency and cost-benefit ratio, which we developed as supplements to genetic coverage. Unlike coverage, these measures factor in the price of a chip or its substitute size (number of SNPs on chip), allowing comparisons to be drawn between differently priced chips. In this fashion, we identified the Affymetrix population-optimized arrays as offering the most cost-effective coverage for the Asian and African population. For the European population, we established the Illumina Human Omni 2.5-8 as the preferred choice. Interestingly, the Affymetrix chip tailored toward an Eastern Asian subpopulation performed well for all three populations investigated. However, our coverage estimates calculated for all chips proved much lower than those advertised by the producers. All our analyses were based on the 1000 Genome Project as reference population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
LD efficiencies of different chips evaluated for European, Asian, and African reference populations. In the efficiency calculations, the r2 threshold varied from 0.1 to 1 in steps of size 0.1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Non-taggable SNPs' efficiencies of different chips evaluated for European, Asian, and African reference populations. In the efficiency calculations, the r2 threshold was varied from 0.1 to 1 in steps of size 0.1.

References

    1. Anderson CA, Pettersson FH, Barrett JC, et al. Evaluating the effects of imputation on the power, coverage, and cost efficiency of genome-wide SNP platforms. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83:112–119. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrett JC, Cardon LR. Evaluating coverage of genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006;38:659–662. - PubMed
    1. Li M, Li C, Guan W. Evaluation of coverage variation of SNP chips for genome-wide association studies. Eur J Hum Genet. 2008;16:635–643. - PubMed
    1. Spencer CC, Su Z, Donnelly P, Marchini J. Designing genome-wide association studies: sample size, power, imputation, and the choice of genotyping chip. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000477. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hao K, Schadt EE, Storey JD. Calibrating the performance of SNP arrays for whole-genome association studies. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000109. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms