Comment on Tian et al.: Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence
- PMID: 24448896
- PMCID: PMC3960422
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3176-3
Comment on Tian et al.: Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence
Comment in
-
Answer to the Letter to the Editor of Feng Li et al. entitled "Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence" by Nai-Feng Tian, Yao-Sen Wu, Xiao-Lei Zhang, Hua-Zi Xu, Yong-Long Chi, Fang-Min Mao (2013). Eur Spine J, doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2747-z.Eur Spine J. 2014 Apr;23(4):929-30. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3185-2. Epub 2014 Jan 18. Eur Spine J. 2014. PMID: 24442185 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence.Eur Spine J. 2013 Aug;22(8):1741-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2747-z. Epub 2013 Apr 10. Eur Spine J. 2013. PMID: 23572345 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, Li CQ, Zheng WJ, Liu J. Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:623–628. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1578-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources