Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug;23(4):539-51.
doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9687-6. Epub 2014 Jan 22.

Lynch syndrome patients' views of and preferences for return of results following whole exome sequencing

Affiliations

Lynch syndrome patients' views of and preferences for return of results following whole exome sequencing

Kelly Hitch et al. J Genet Couns. 2014 Aug.

Abstract

Whole exome sequencing (WES) uses next generation sequencing technology to provide information on nearly all functional, protein-coding regions in an individual's genome. Due to the vast amount of information and incidental findings that can be generated from this technology, patient preferences must be investigated to help clinicians consent and return results to patients. Patients (n = 19) who were previously clinically diagnosed with Lynch syndrome, but received uninformative negative Lynch syndrome genetic results through traditional molecular testing methods participated in semi-structured interviews after WES testing but before return of results to explore their views of WES and preferences for return of results. Analyses of interview results found that nearly all participants believed that the benefits of receiving all possible results generated from WES outweighed the undesirable effects. The majority of participants conveyed that relative to coping with a cancer diagnosis, information generated from WES would be manageable. Importantly, participants' experience with Lynch syndrome influenced their notions of genetic determinism, tolerance for uncertain results, and family communication plans. Participants would prefer to receive WES results in person from a genetic counselor or medical geneticist so that an expert could help explain the meaning and implications of the potentially large quantity and range of complicated results. These results underscore the need to study various populations with regard to the clinical use of WES in order to effectively and empathetically communicate the possible implications of this new technology and return results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of Conflict The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Overall preference related to receiving WES results (n=19)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aktan-Collan K, Mecklin JP, Jarvinen H, Nystrom-Lahti M, Peltomaki P, Soderling I, et al. Predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: Uptake and long-term satisfaction. Internal Journal of Cancer. 2000;89(1):44–50. - PubMed
    1. Ambry Genetics. Exome test requisition, preverification, & consent form – proband. 2012 Retrieved from http://www.ambrygen.com/sites/default/files/pdfs/forms/Exome_Req_Consent....
    1. ACMG Board of Directors. Points to consider in the clinical application of genomic sequencing. Genetics in Medicine. 2012;14(8):759–761. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.74. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bamshad MJ, Ng SB, Bigham AW, Tabor HK, Emond MJ, Nickerson DA, et al. Exome sequencing as a tool for mendelian disease gene discovery. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2011;12:745–754. doi: 10.1038/nrg3031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist. 1982;37(2):122–147. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122. - DOI