Lynch syndrome patients' views of and preferences for return of results following whole exome sequencing
- PMID: 24449059
- PMCID: PMC4451087
- DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9687-6
Lynch syndrome patients' views of and preferences for return of results following whole exome sequencing
Abstract
Whole exome sequencing (WES) uses next generation sequencing technology to provide information on nearly all functional, protein-coding regions in an individual's genome. Due to the vast amount of information and incidental findings that can be generated from this technology, patient preferences must be investigated to help clinicians consent and return results to patients. Patients (n = 19) who were previously clinically diagnosed with Lynch syndrome, but received uninformative negative Lynch syndrome genetic results through traditional molecular testing methods participated in semi-structured interviews after WES testing but before return of results to explore their views of WES and preferences for return of results. Analyses of interview results found that nearly all participants believed that the benefits of receiving all possible results generated from WES outweighed the undesirable effects. The majority of participants conveyed that relative to coping with a cancer diagnosis, information generated from WES would be manageable. Importantly, participants' experience with Lynch syndrome influenced their notions of genetic determinism, tolerance for uncertain results, and family communication plans. Participants would prefer to receive WES results in person from a genetic counselor or medical geneticist so that an expert could help explain the meaning and implications of the potentially large quantity and range of complicated results. These results underscore the need to study various populations with regard to the clinical use of WES in order to effectively and empathetically communicate the possible implications of this new technology and return results.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Not the End of the Odyssey: Parental Perceptions of Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) in Pediatric Undiagnosed Disorders.J Genet Couns. 2016 Oct;25(5):1019-31. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9933-1. Epub 2016 Feb 12. J Genet Couns. 2016. PMID: 26868367
-
Stakeholders' opinions on the implementation of pediatric whole exome sequencing: implications for informed consent.J Genet Couns. 2014 Aug;23(4):552-65. doi: 10.1007/s10897-013-9626-y. Epub 2013 Jul 12. J Genet Couns. 2014. PMID: 23846343 Free PMC article.
-
Oncologists' and cancer patients' views on whole-exome sequencing and incidental findings: results from the CanSeq study.Genet Med. 2016 Oct;18(10):1011-9. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.207. Epub 2016 Feb 11. Genet Med. 2016. PMID: 26866579 Free PMC article.
-
Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: A Focus on Lynch Syndrome and Associated Endometrial Cancer.J Mol Diagn. 2015 Sep;17(5):472-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jul 8. J Mol Diagn. 2015. PMID: 26162329 Review.
-
Scoping the family history: assessment of Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) in primary care settings--a primer for nurse practitioners.J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008 Feb;20(2):76-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2007.00282.x. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008. PMID: 18271762 Review.
Cited by
-
Preferences for return of incidental findings from genome sequencing among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age.Clin Genet. 2016 Mar;89(3):378-84. doi: 10.1111/cge.12597. Epub 2015 May 5. Clin Genet. 2016. PMID: 25871653 Free PMC article.
-
Preferences for return of germline genome sequencing results for cancer patients and their genetic relatives in a research setting.Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Aug;30(8):930-937. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01069-y. Epub 2022 Mar 11. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022. PMID: 35277654 Free PMC article.
-
Illustrative case studies in the return of exome and genome sequencing results.Per Med. 2015;12(3):283-295. doi: 10.2217/pme.14.89. Per Med. 2015. PMID: 26478737 Free PMC article.
-
Enrolling Genomics Research Participants through a Clinical Setting: the Impact of Existing Clinical Relationships on Informed Consent and Expectations for Return of Research Results.J Genet Couns. 2018 Feb;27(1):263-273. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0143-2. Epub 2017 Sep 20. J Genet Couns. 2018. PMID: 28932961 Free PMC article.
-
Privacy and ethical challenges in next-generation sequencing.Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev. 2019;4(2):95-104. doi: 10.1080/23808993.2019.1599685. Epub 2019 Apr 8. Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev. 2019. PMID: 32775691 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Aktan-Collan K, Mecklin JP, Jarvinen H, Nystrom-Lahti M, Peltomaki P, Soderling I, et al. Predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: Uptake and long-term satisfaction. Internal Journal of Cancer. 2000;89(1):44–50. - PubMed
-
- Ambry Genetics. Exome test requisition, preverification, & consent form – proband. 2012 Retrieved from http://www.ambrygen.com/sites/default/files/pdfs/forms/Exome_Req_Consent....
-
- Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist. 1982;37(2):122–147. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122. - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical