Australians' knowledge and perceptions of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing
- PMID: 24450520
- DOI: 10.1111/imj.12289
Australians' knowledge and perceptions of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing
Abstract
Background: As direct-to-consumer personal genome testing (DTC-PGT) is increasingly available in Australia, knowledge of Australians' perceptions and attitudes towards this technology is needed in order to assess the (potential) impact it might have on the Australian public and healthcare system.
Aims: To explore the knowledge and perceptions of DTC-PGT in an Australian sample.
Methods: An online survey asking about knowledge and perceptions of DTC-PGT, undertaken between October 2011 and April 2012, of 270 Australian residents. Results were analysed using SAS.
Results: Our study found limited consumer knowledge of, and interest in, pursuing DTC-PGT in Australia. Ninety-three per cent of respondents correctly identified DTC-PGT as available to consumers directly, but only 40% correctly identified its availability in Australia. When asked about the content and value of the information DTC-PGT provides, the majority of respondents indentified that DTC-PGT could provide information about one's health and/or ancestry (82% and 74%). Additionally, respondents indicated they believed this information to be equally important as non-genetic information about one's ancestry and health.
Conclusion: While a minority of respondents expressed an intention to pursue DTC-PGT (27%), the majority of respondents, irrespective of whether they wished to pursue it or not, believed that genetic information was as important as non-genetic information in regards to their health and their ancestry. The value ascribed to genetic information suggests that genetics plays a role in people's lives, and that further qualitative research could explore the ways in which people might use and understand the genetic information provided by DTC-PGT.
Keywords: consumer health information; ethical issue; predictive genetic testing; survey methodology.
© 2013 The Authors; Internal Medicine Journal © 2013 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.
Similar articles
-
Australians' perspectives on support around use of personal genomic testing: Findings from the Genioz study.Eur J Med Genet. 2019 May;62(5):290-299. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 13. Eur J Med Genet. 2019. PMID: 30439534
-
Consumer Perceptions of Interactions With Primary Care Providers After Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing.Ann Intern Med. 2016 Apr 19;164(8):513-22. doi: 10.7326/M15-0995. Epub 2016 Mar 1. Ann Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 26928821
-
The general public's understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic test results.Public Health Genomics. 2012;15(1):11-21. doi: 10.1159/000327159. Epub 2011 Jun 30. Public Health Genomics. 2012. PMID: 21720148
-
Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: ethical and regulatory issues that arise from wanting to 'know' your DNA.Intern Med J. 2010 Mar;40(3):220-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2010.02190.x. Intern Med J. 2010. PMID: 20446967 Review.
-
Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing and cancer risk prediction.Cancer J. 2012 Jul-Aug;18(4):293-302. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3182610e38. Cancer J. 2012. PMID: 22846729 Review.
Cited by
-
From Expectations to Experiences: Consumer Autonomy and Choice in Personal Genomic Testing.AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020 Jan-Mar;11(1):63-76. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1701583. Epub 2019 Dec 30. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020. PMID: 31885332 Free PMC article.
-
Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 14;17(12):e279. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4378. J Med Internet Res. 2015. PMID: 26677835 Free PMC article.
-
Australians' views and experience of personal genomic testing: survey findings from the Genioz study.Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 May;27(5):711-720. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0325-x. Epub 2019 Jan 21. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019. PMID: 30666046 Free PMC article.
-
The PiGeOn project: protocol of a longitudinal study examining psychosocial and ethical issues and outcomes in germline genomic sequencing for cancer.BMC Cancer. 2018 Apr 23;18(1):454. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4366-x. BMC Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29685123 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative study on Singaporean women's views towards breast cancer screening and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) gene testing to guide personalised screening strategies.BMC Cancer. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3781-8. BMC Cancer. 2017. PMID: 29162038 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous