Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;20(1):111-136.
doi: 10.1080/10807039.2013.770350. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

Evaluation of Potential Exposure to Metals in Laundered Shop Towels

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Evaluation of Potential Exposure to Metals in Laundered Shop Towels

Leslie A Beyer et al. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2014 Jan.
Free PMC article

Abstract

We reported in 2003 that exposure to metals on laundered shop towels (LSTs) could exceed toxicity criteria. New data from LSTs used by workers in North America document the continued presence of metals in freshly laundered towels. We assessed potential exposure to metals based on concentrations of metals on the LSTs, estimates of LST usage by employees, and the transfer of metals from LST-to-hand, hand-to-mouth, and LST-to-lip, under average- or high-exposure scenarios. Exposure estimates were compared to toxicity criteria. Under an average-exposure scenario (excluding metals' data outliers), exceedances of the California Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry toxicity criteria may occur for aluminum, cadmium, cobalt, copper, iron, and lead. Calculated intakes for these metals were up to more than 400-fold higher (lead) than their respective toxicity criterion. For the high-exposure scenario, additional exceedances may occur, and high-exposure intakes were up to 1,170-fold higher (lead) than their respective toxicity criterion. A sensitivity analysis indicated that alternate plausible assumptions could increase or decrease the magnitude of exceedances, but were unlikely to eliminate certain exceedances, particularly for lead.

Keywords: cadmium; dermal exposure; lead; metals; occupational exposure; risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Unused shop towel. (Color figure available online.)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Laundered shop towel with area selected for analysis. (Color figure available online.)
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Composition of selected particles from area selected for analysis in Figure 2. (Color figure available online.)
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Spectrum from area selected for analysis in Figure 2. (Color figure available online.)

Similar articles

References

    1. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry) Minimal Risk Levels (Mrls) for Hazardous Substances. 2012. Available at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/mrls/pdfs/atsdr_mrls_february_2012.pdf.
    1. Babich MA. CPSC Staff Preliminary Risk Assessment of Flame Retardant (FR) Chemicals in Upholstered Furniture Foam. Bethesda, MD, USA: US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC); 2006. Available at http://www.cpsc.gov/library/foia/foia07/brief/ufurn2.pdf.
    1. Beamer P, Canales RA, Leckie JO. Developing probability distributions for transfer efficiencies for dermal exposure. J Exposure Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2009;19:274–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergstrom C, Shirai J, Kissel J. Particle size distributions, size concentration relationships, and adherence to hands of selected geologic media derived from mining, smelting, and quarrying activities. Sci Total Environ. 2011;409:4247–56. - PubMed
    1. Beyer LA, Seeley MR, Beck BD. Evaluation of potential exposure to metals in laundered shop towels. Int Nonwovens J. 2003;12:22–37. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources