Robotics in Gynecology: Why is this Technology Worth Pursuing?
- PMID: 24453521
- PMCID: PMC3888078
- DOI: 10.4137/CMRH.S10850
Robotics in Gynecology: Why is this Technology Worth Pursuing?
Abstract
Robotic laparoscopy in gynecology, which started in 2005 when the Da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Inc) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in gynecologic procedures, represents today a modern, safe, and precise approach to pathology in this field. Since then, a great deal of experience has accumulated, and it has been shown that there is almost no gynecological surgery that cannot be approached with this technology, namely hysterectomy, myomectomy, sacrocolpopexia, and surgery for the treatment of endometriosis. Albeit no advantages have been observed over conventional laparoscopy and some open surgical procedures, robotics do seem to be advantageous in highly complicated procedures when extensive dissection and proper anatomy reestablishment is required, as in the case of oncologic surgery. There is no doubt that implementation of better logistics in finance, training, design, and application will exert a positive effect upon robotics expansion in gynecological medicine. Contrary to expectations, we estimate that a special impact is to be seen in emerging countries where novel technologies have resulted in benefits in the organization of health care systems.
Keywords: gynecology; hysterectomy; laparoscopy; myomectomy; robotics.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Robotic surgery in gynecology.J Minim Access Surg. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):50-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.147690. J Minim Access Surg. 2015. PMID: 25598600 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Robotic surgery in gynecology].Orv Hetil. 2012 Jun 24;153(25):967-72. doi: 10.1556/OH.2012.29373. Orv Hetil. 2012. PMID: 22714030 Review. Hungarian.
-
[Robotics in gynecology. Background, feasibility and applicability].Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2012 Jun;80(6):409-16. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2012. PMID: 22826969 Review. Spanish.
-
Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;28(4):304-10. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000293. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27362711 Review.
-
The role of robotic surgery in gynecology.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;19(4):331-6. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328216f90b. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17625414 Review.
Cited by
-
Corneal abrasion in hysterectomy and prostatectomy: role of laparoscopic and robotic assistance.Anesthesiology. 2015 May;122(5):994-1001. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000630. Anesthesiology. 2015. PMID: 25734923 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the Quality and Influence of YouTube as a Source of Information on Robotic Myomectomy.J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 28;12(11):1779. doi: 10.3390/jpm12111779. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 36579495 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic surgery in gynecology.J Minim Access Surg. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):50-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.147690. J Minim Access Surg. 2015. PMID: 25598600 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Currie A. The History of Robotics. 1999
-
- Rosheim ME. Leonardo’s Lost Robots. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2006. p. 69.
-
- Zunt D. Who did actually invent the word “robot” and what does it mean? Karel Capek; [Accessed June 30, 2013]. website. http://capek.misto.cz/english/robot.html.
-
- WeBSurg.com. The history of robotics. 2006. p. 6. http://www.websurg.com/ref/doi-ed01en0021.htm.
-
- Satava RM. Robotics, telepresence and virtual reality: a critical analysis of the future of surgery. Minimally Invasive Therapy. 1992;1:357–363.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources