Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;20(2):98-103.
doi: 10.1590/S1413-78522012000200008.

Action of therapeutic laser and ultrasound in peripheral nerve regeneration

Affiliations

Action of therapeutic laser and ultrasound in peripheral nerve regeneration

Fabrício Borges Oliveira et al. Acta Ortop Bras. 2012.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy of early therapeutic laser and ultrasound in the regeneration process of an injury in rats.

Methods: We used 24 rats. Eighteen underwent surgery for sciatic nerve compression by a hemostat above the popliteal fossa. The animals were divided into three groups of six animals each. Normal control group. GI: Injured control without therapeutic intervention. GII: laser ArGaAl therapeutic intervention. GIII: therapeutic intervention of Pulsed Ultrasound. We begin therapeutic interventions 24 hours after injury, with daily applications for a period of fourteen consecutive days.

Results: IN ASSESSING THE GIRTH OF THE MUSCLES OF THE RIGHT THEY, THE FOLLOWING AVERAGE DECREASE (IN MM) FOR EACH GI: 0.45, GII: 0.42, GIII: 0.40 In relation to travel time, both GII and GIII presented significant difference when compared to GI. In the final evaluation of the IFC, GII excelled in the GIII. As for the healing observed, a major great improvement was observed in GII and GIII.

Conclusion: The results showed that nerve recovery was higher with the laser application. Level of evidence II, Therapeutic Studies - Investigation of the results of treatment.

Keywords: Laser therapy, low-level; Nerve crush; Nerve regeneration; Sciatic nerve; Ultrasonic therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All the authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest referring to this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphic representation of the travel time during the evaluations of the analyzed groups.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graphic representation of the SFI of the control groups. Source: Data from the Survey
Figure 3A and 3B
Figure 3A and 3B
Representation of the footprints on the walking track of the normal control group A and B: injured control group. Source: Data from the survey
Figure 4
Figure 4
Graphic representation of the mean values of SFI of the groups evaluated at 3 days of evaluation. Source: Data from the survey
Figure 5 (A, B, C)
Figure 5 (A, B, C)
Representation of the footprints of groups GI, GII and GIII in the 1st evaluation. Source: Data from the survey
Figure 6
Figure 6
(A, B, C). Representation of the footprints of groups GI, GII and GIII in the 2nd evaluation. Source: Data from the survey
Figure 7 (A, B, C)
Figure 7 (A, B, C)
Representation of the footprints of groups GI, GII and GIII in the 3rd evaluation. Source: Data from the survey

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mendonça AC. Estudo da regeneração do nervo ciático de rato submetido a estimulação elétrica após lesão por esmagamento [dissertação] Ribeirão Preto: Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto; 2002.
    1. Seddon HJ. Surgical disorders of the peripheral nerves. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1975.
    1. Lundborg G. A 25-year perspective of peripheral nerve surgery: evolving neuroscientific concepts and clinical significance. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25(3):391–414. - PubMed
    1. Rasp VVM. Os efeitos do ultra som terapêutico no tratamento das lesões por esmagamento do nervo ciático de ratos [dissertação] Ribeirão Preto: Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto; 2002.
    1. Millesi H. Techniques for nerve grafting. Hand Clin. 2000;16(1):73–91. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources