Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;20(3):139-49.
doi: 10.1590/S1413-78522012000300003.

Analysis of the reliability and reproducibility of goniometry compared to hand photogrammetry

Affiliations

Analysis of the reliability and reproducibility of goniometry compared to hand photogrammetry

Rosana Martins Ferreira de Carvalho et al. Acta Ortop Bras. 2012.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the intra- and inter-examiner reliability and reproducibility of goniometry in relation to photogrammetry of hand, comparing the angles of thumb abduction, PIP joint flexion of the II finger and MCP joint flexion of the V finger.

Methods: The study included 30 volunteers, who were divided into three groups: one group of 10 physiotherapy students, one group of 10 physiotherapists, and a third group of 10 therapists of the hand. Each examiner performed the measurements on the same hand mold, using the goniometer followed by two photogrammetry software programs; CorelDraw(®) and ALCimagem(®).

Results: The results revealed that the groups and the methods proposed presented inter-examiner reliability, generally rated as excellent (ICC 0.998 I.C. 95% 0.995 - 0.999). In the intra-examiner evaluation, an excellent level of reliability was found between the three groups. In the comparison between groups for each angle and each method, no significant differences were found between the groups for most of the measurements.

Conclusion: Goniometry and photogrammetry are reliable and reproducible methods for evaluating measurements of the hand. However, due to the lack of similar references, detailed studies are needed to define the normal parameters between the methods in the joints of the hand. Level of Evidence II, Diagnostic Study.

Keywords: Goniometry; Hands; Photogrammetry; Reproducibility of tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All the authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest referring to this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Wax hand in the position in which the photographic record was taken.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Goniometer used - CARCI, Americanópolis, São Paulo, adapted at the Precision Workshop of USP.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Angle of palmar abduction of thumb, using CorelDraw X3 software.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Angle of flexion of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the second finger using ALCimagem 2.1 software.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean ICC values between the methods for each angle.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Mean standard deviation values between the methods for each angle.

References

    1. Oliveira LM, Araújo PMP. Sociedade Brasileira de Terapeutas da Mão . Recomendações para avaliação do membro superior. São Paulo: Sociedade Brasileira de Terapeutas da Mão; 2003. Medida da amplitude articular; pp. 37–49.
    1. Norkin CC, Write DJ. Medida do movimento articular: Manual de Goniometria. 2a ed. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1997.
    1. Venturini C, Ituassú NT, Teixeira LM, Deus CVO. Confiabilidade intra e interexaminadores de dois métodos de medida da amplitude ativa de dorsiflexão do tornozelo em indivíduos saudáveis. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2006;10(4):407–11.
    1. Pardini Junior GA. Anatomia funcional. In: Freitas PP, editor. Reabilitação da mão. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2006.
    1. Freitas AD. Semiologia. In: Freitas PP, editor. Reabilitação da mão. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2006.

LinkOut - more resources