Managing incidental genomic findings in clinical trials: fulfillment of the principle of justice
- PMID: 24453945
- PMCID: PMC3891615
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001584
Managing incidental genomic findings in clinical trials: fulfillment of the principle of justice
Abstract
Rafael Dal-Ré and colleagues discuss how incidental findings are likely to be viewed as potential benefits of research participation in genomics trials, and investigators should implement mechanisms to ensure provision of timely and appropriate care. Ensuring provision of such interventions in countries lacking a universal public health care system may prove challenging.
Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and may not reflect the opinions of the organizations that they work for.
Similar articles
-
Management and return of incidental genomic findings in clinical trials.Pharmacogenomics J. 2015 Feb;15(1):1-5. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2014.62. Epub 2014 Oct 28. Pharmacogenomics J. 2015. PMID: 25348616 Review.
-
Health for Whom? Bioethics and the Challenge of Justice for Genomic Medicine.Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 May;50 Suppl 1:S2-S5. doi: 10.1002/hast.1149. Hastings Cent Rep. 2020. PMID: 32597531
-
Ubuntu philosophy and the consensus regarding incidental findings in genomic research: a heuristic approach.Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Sep;23(3):433-444. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09953-4. Med Health Care Philos. 2020. PMID: 32335796
-
Genomic test validation for incidental findings.Clin Chem. 2014 Feb;60(2):292-3. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.210609. Epub 2013 Jul 1. Clin Chem. 2014. PMID: 23818443 No abstract available.
-
[Ethical issues in genome-era].Nihon Rinsho. 2016 Jun;74(6):1022-7. Nihon Rinsho. 2016. PMID: 27311196 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Impact of Next Generation Sequencing on the Organization and Funding of Returning Research Results: Survey of Canadian Research Ethics Boards Members.PLoS One. 2016 May 11;11(5):e0154965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154965. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27167380 Free PMC article.
-
Management and return of incidental genomic findings in clinical trials.Pharmacogenomics J. 2015 Feb;15(1):1-5. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2014.62. Epub 2014 Oct 28. Pharmacogenomics J. 2015. PMID: 25348616 Review.
-
Practices and Attitudes toward Returning Genomic Research Results to Low-Resource Research Participants.Public Health Genomics. 2021;24(5-6):241-252. doi: 10.1159/000516782. Epub 2021 Jul 6. Public Health Genomics. 2021. PMID: 34229325 Free PMC article.
-
To disclose, or not to disclose? Context matters.Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Mar;23(3):279-84. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.108. Epub 2014 Jun 11. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015. PMID: 24916647 Free PMC article.
-
Incidental findings of uncertain significance: To know or not to know--that is not the question.BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Feb 13;17:13. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0096-2. BMC Med Ethics. 2016. PMID: 26873084 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1979) Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Fed Regist 44: 23192–23197.
-
- Dresser R (2011) The role of patient advocates and public representatives in research. In: Emanuel EJ, Grady C, Crouch RA, Lie RK, Miller FG, et al. The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 231–241.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical