Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013:444:12070.
doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/444/1/012070.

How accurate is image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) delivered with a micro-irradiator?

Affiliations

How accurate is image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) delivered with a micro-irradiator?

M Oldham et al. J Phys Conf Ser. 2013.

Abstract

There is significant interest in delivering precisely targeted small-volume radiation treatments, in the pre-clinical setting, to study dose-volume relationships with tumor control and normal tissue damage. In this work we investigate the IGRT targeting accuracy of the XRad225Cx system from Precision x-Ray using high resolution 3D dosimetry techniques. Initial results revealed a significant targeting error of about 2.4mm. This error was reduced to within 0.5mm after the IGRT hardware and software had been recalibrated. The facility for 3D dosimetry was essential to gain a comprehensive understanding of the targeting error in 3D.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustrative projection images through (a) an un-irradiated, and (b) an irradiated Presage dosimeter.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) an axial view through the Presage dosimeter at a plane through one of the 4 target points. (b) the same image but with central beam line annotations to highlight the cone misalignment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Illustrative projection images, after recalibration of the IGRT system, through (a) an un-irradiated, and (b) an irradiated Presage dosimeter.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) axial view through the Presage dosimeter at a plane through one of the 4 target points treated with a 1mm cone. (b) the same image but with central beam line annotations to highlight much improved alignment compared with Figure 2. (c) similar image through another target point treated with a 5mm cone.

References

    1. Newton J, et al. Med Phys. 2011;38:6754–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chow JC, et al. Med Phys. 2010;37:5322–9. - PubMed
    1. Thomas A, et al. Med Phys. 2011;38:4846–57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sakhalkar HS, et al. Med Phys. 2009;36:71–82. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources