Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2013 Nov 13;4(4):528-40.
doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-07-RA-0048. eCollection 2013.

A pilot trial of a computerized renal template note to improve resident knowledge and documentation of kidney disease

Affiliations
Observational Study

A pilot trial of a computerized renal template note to improve resident knowledge and documentation of kidney disease

S Shirazian et al. Appl Clin Inform. .

Abstract

Background: Kidney disease is under-documented in physician notes. The use of template-guided notes may improve physician recognition of kidney disease early in training.

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether a computerized inpatient renal template note with clinical decision support improves resident knowledge and documentation of kidney disease.

Methods: In this prospective study, first year medical residents were encouraged to use the renal template note for documentation over a one-month period. The renal template note included an option for classification of acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) categories with a link to standard classifications. Pre- and post-knowledge of AKI and CKD categories was tested with a quiz and surveys of resident experience with the intervention were conducted. Appropriate AKI and/or CKD classification was determined in 100 renal template notes and 112 comparable historical internal medicine resident progress notes from approximately one year prior.

Results: 2,435 inpatient encounters amongst 15 residents who participated were documented using the renal template note. A significantly higher percent of residents correctly staged earlier stage CKD (CKD3) using the renal template note compared to historical notes (9/46 vs. 0/33, p<0.01). Documentation of AKI and more advanced CKD stages (CKD4 and 5) did not improve. Knowledge based on quiz scores increased modestly but was not significant. The renal template note was well received by residents and was perceived as helping improve knowledge and documentation of kidney disease.

Conclusion: The renal template note significantly improved staging of earlier stage CKD (CKD3) with a modest but non-significant improvement in resident knowledge. Given the importance of early recognition and treatment of CKD, future studies should focus on teaching early recognition using template notes with supplemental educational interventions.

Keywords: Clinical decision support systems; electronic medical records; kidney disease; medical education; templates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
The study note incorporated into the computerized progress note template. Residents were prompted to click on the appropriate classification of their patient’s kidney disease. When the AKI or CKD box was clicked, residents were prompted to sub-classify AKI into risk, injury, failure or loss categories based on the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) – Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss or End Stage Renal Disease (RIFLE) classification scheme [3] and/or to sub-classify CKD into stages based on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines [4]. Clinical decision support for the template note consisted of a link embedded in the progress note to an intranet webpage where residents could obtain RIFLE classification guidelines, CKD staging guidelines and a simplified 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) calculator.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Collins AJ, Foley RN, Chavers B, Gilbertson D, Herzog C, Johansen K, Kasiske B, Kutner N, Liu J, St Peter W, Guo H, Gustafson S, Heubner B, Lamb K, Li S, Peng Y, Qiu Y, Roberts T, Skeans M, Snyder J, Solid C, Thompson B, Wang C, Weinhandl E, Zaun D, Arko C, Chen SC, Daniels F, Ebben J, Frazier E, Hanzlik C, Johnson R, Sheets D, Wang X, Forrest B, Constantini E, Everson S, Eggers P, Agodoa L. ’United States Renal Data System 2011 Annual Data Report: Atlas of chronic kidney disease & end-stage renal disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2012; 59(1 Suppl 1): A7, e1–420 - PubMed
    1. Kinchen KS, Sadler J, Fink N, Brookmeyer R, Klag MJ, Levey AS, Powe NR. The timing of specialist evaluation in chronic kidney disease and mortality. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137(6): 479–486 - PubMed
    1. Levinsky NG. Specialist evaluation in chronic kidney disease: too little, too late. Ann Intern Med 2002 Sep; 137(6): 542–543 - PubMed
    1. Rothberg MB, Kehoe ED, Courtemanche AL, Kenosi T, Pekow PS, Brennan MJ, Mulhern JG, Braden GL. Recognition and management of chronic kidney disease in an elderly ambulatory population. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23(8): 1125–1130 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chase HS, Radhakrishnan J, Shirazian S, Rao MK, Vawdrey DK. Under-documentation of chronic kidney disease in the electronic health record in outpatients. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010; 17(5): 588–594 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types