Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Feb 1;5(1):e48-53.
doi: 10.4317/jced.50680.

History of materials used for recording static and dynamic occlusal contact marks: a literature review

Affiliations
Review

History of materials used for recording static and dynamic occlusal contact marks: a literature review

Ashu Sharma et al. J Clin Exp Dent. .

Abstract

In the discipline of prosthetic dentistry it is important not only to examine the occlusion, but to be able to record, store, and transfer the information. Over the years many occlusion testing materials have been used. It has been suggested the clinical recording and transfer of information using waxes and other occlusion recording materials have disadvantages relating to inaccuracy and problems of manipulation. Therefore, there has been introduction of many new systems for recording occlusion contacts to overcome such problems. The correct physiological recovery of occlusion posses as much a challenge as ever for every dentist and technician. Even the smallest high spots measuring just a few microns can cause dysfunctions like temporo-mandibular pain. Occlusal proportions are being constantly changed with every procedure. Therefore, an understanding of the synergy of the teeth in static and dynamic occlusion forms the basis of good dentistry. The purpose of this review article is to give and overview of the various materials and methods that have been used to record occlusal contact marks. Key words:Occlusal contact marks, Occlusion indicators, Occlusion test materials, Occlusion recording materials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exist.

References

    1. Saraçoğlu A, Ozpinar B. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of occlusal indicator sensitivity. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:522–6. - PubMed
    1. Baba K, Tsukiyama Y, Clark GT. Reliability, validity, and utility of various occlusal measurement methods and techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:83–9. - PubMed
    1. Takai A, Nakano M, Bando E, Hewlett ER. Evaluation of three occlusal examination methods used to record tooth contacts in lateral excursive movements. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70:500–5. - PubMed
    1. Schelb E, Kaiser DA, Brukl CE. Thickness and marking characteristics of occlusal registration strips. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;54:122–6. - PubMed
    1. Zuccari AG, Oshida Y, Okamura M, Paez CY, Moore BK. Bulge ductility of several occlusal contact measuring paper-based sheets. Biomed Mater Eng. 1997;7:265–70. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources