Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013:2013:653805.
doi: 10.1155/2013/653805. Epub 2013 Dec 18.

Utilization of Oncotype DX in an Inner City Population: Race or Place?

Affiliations

Utilization of Oncotype DX in an Inner City Population: Race or Place?

Amber A Guth et al. Int J Breast Cancer. 2013.

Abstract

Oncotype DX, a 21-gene-array analysis, can guide chemotherapy treatment decisions for women with ER+ tumors. Of 225 ER+ women participating in a patient assistance trial, 23% underwent Oncotype DX testing: 31% of whites, 21% of blacks, and 14% of Hispanics (P = 0.04) were tested. Only 3 white women were treated at municipal hospitals and none was tested. 3% of women treated in municipal hospital as compared to 30% treated at tertiary referral centers were tested (P = 0.001). Within tertiary referral centers, there was no racial difference in testing: 32% of whites, 29% of blacks, and 19% of Hispanics (P = 0.25). Multivariate analysis (model c-statistic = 0.76; P < 0.0001) revealed that women who underwent testing were more likely to have stage 1B (RR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.45-1.85) and to be treated after 2007 (RR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.01-1.65) and less likely to be treated at a municipal hospital (RR = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.04-0.94). Women treated at municipal hospitals were less likely to undergo testing resulting in a misleading racial disparity that is driven by site of care. As Oncotype DX can reduce overuse of chemotherapy, it is imperative to expand testing to those who could benefit from yet experience underuse of this test, namely, women treated at safety net hospitals. This trial is registered with NCT00233077.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2007 ;200(25):5287–5312. - PubMed
    1. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast Cancer V. 2.2008. 2008.
    1. Kondo M, Hoshi S-L, Yamanaka T, Ishiguro H, Toi M. Economic evaluation of the 21-gene signature (Oncotype DX) in lymph node-negative/positive, hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer based on Japanese validation study (JBCRG-TR03) Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2011;127(3):739–749. - PubMed
    1. Bickell NA, Neuman J, Fei RKAJ. Quality of breast cancer care: perception versus practice. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2012;30(15):1791–1795. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bickell NA, Geduld AN, Joseph KA, et al. Do community-based patient assistance programs affect the treatment and well-being of patients with breast cancer? Journal of Oncology Practice. 2013 - PMC - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources