Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug;1(2):123-33.
doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0058.

Antigen-specific bacterial vaccine combined with anti-PD-L1 rescues dysfunctional endogenous T cells to reject long-established cancer

Affiliations

Antigen-specific bacterial vaccine combined with anti-PD-L1 rescues dysfunctional endogenous T cells to reject long-established cancer

David C Binder et al. Cancer Immunol Res. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

Immunogenic tumors grow progressively even when heavily infiltrated by CD8(+) T cells. We investigated how to rescue CD8(+) T cell function in long-established immunogenic melanomas that contained a high percentage of endogenous PD-1(+) tumor-specific CD8(+) T cells that were dysfunctional. Treatment with αPD-L1 and αCTLA-4 blocking antibodies did not prevent tumors from progressing rapidly. We then tested exogenous tumor-specific antigen delivery into tumors using Salmonella Typhimurium A1-R to increase antigen levels and generate a proinflammatory tumor microenvironment. Antigen-producing A1-R rescued the endogenous tumor-specific CD8(+) T cell response: proliferation was induced in the lymphoid organs and effector function was recovered in the tumor. Treatment with antigen-producing A1-R led to improved mouse survival and resulted in 32% rejection of long-established immunogenic melanomas. Following treatment with antigen-producing A1-R, the majority of tumor-specific CD8(+) T cells still expressed a high level of PD-1 in the tumor. Combining antigen-producing A1-R with αPD-L1 blocking antibody enhanced the expansion of tumor-specific CD8(+) T cells and resulted in 80% tumor rejection. Collectively, these data demonstrate a powerful new therapeutic approach to rescue dysfunctional endogenous tumor-specific CD8(+) T cells and eradicate advanced immunogenic tumors.

Keywords: CD8+ T cell rescue; PD-L1; S. Typhimurium; Tumor rejection; vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ming Zhao and AntiCancer, Inc. hold patents for tumor-targeting bacteria. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. A1-R SIINF delivers the SIINFEKL epitope into APCs for MHC Class I presentation
A) Diagram of the SIINF, SNFV, and EGFP constructs used in this study. B) High-copy number plasmids encoding the respective SIINF and SNFV fusion protein constructs were introduced into the A1-R strain. Whole bacterial lysates were examined for fusion protein expression using the anti-M45 antibody. C) J774 Kb-expressing macrophages were infected with A1-R SIINF or A1-R SNFV. Infected macrophages were then incubated with the B3Z (SIINFEKL-specific CD8+ T cell) hybridoma for 24 hours. B3Z stimulation was evaluated by the amount of IL-2 secreted into the culture as determined by ELISA. Data are representative of 2 independent experiments.
Figure 2
Figure 2. B16-OVA cancer cell inoculation induces priming of endogenous SIINF-specific CD8+ T cells that heavily infiltrate tumors
A) C57BL/6 mice were inoculated with B16-OVA cancer cells. At the indicated times, the peripheral blood leukocytes were stained with anti-CD8 and either SIINF/Kb-dimerX or control SIYR/Kb-dimerX. Data were pooled from 6 total mice with progressively growing tumors compiled from 2 independent experiments. B) B16-OVA and B16 tumor growth was measured following injection of 5 × 106 cancer cells into C57BL/6 or C57BL/6 CD8−/− mice. The mean tumor volume (±SD) was calculated for each time-point. Each group consisted of 4 mice with progressively growing tumors; data are representative of 2 independent experiments. C) B16-OVA cancer cells were inoculated in a C57BL/6 mouse. 18 days later, the B16-OVA tumor reached 144 mm3. Single cell suspensions were made from the tumor-draining lymph node (TDLN), lungs, spleen, and tumor. The suspensions were stained with anti-CD8 and either SIINF/Kb-dimerX (SIINF-dX) or control SIYR/Kb-dimerX (SIYR-dX). Data are representative of 3 total mice from 2 independent experiments.
Figure 3
Figure 3. A1-R SIINF treatment rescues the SIINF-specific CD8+ T cell response in the blood and tumor
C57BL/6 mice bearing B16-OVA tumors were analyzed from the following groups: untreated tumors at day 0 (defined when tumors reached 100–168 mm3); untreated tumors at day 8; A1-R control-treated tumors 8–9 days post-treatment; and A1-R SIINF-treated tumors 8–9 days post-treatment. A) The peripheral blood was stained with anti-CD8 and SIINF/Kb-dimerX. The top panel is a representative stain from one mouse and the bottom panel contains pooled data with each mouse represented by a single dot. The A1-R control treatment group consists of 2 mice treated with A1-R SNFV and 2 mice treated with A1-R EGFP. ***p<0.001 when comparing A1-R SIINF to each other group. B) The upper two rows analyzed the percentage of SIINF-specific CD8+ T cells from tumors. Single cell suspensions from tumors were stained with anti-CD8 and either SIINF/Kb-dimerX or control SIYR/Kb-dimerX. The top panel is a representative stain from one mouse per group. The bottom panel contains pooled data from individual mice derived from at least 2 independent experiments per treatment group. The percentage of SIINF-specific CD8+ T cells represents the percentage of cells that stained positive with SIINF/Kb-dimerX subtracted by the background percentage of cells that stained positive with SIYR/Kb-dimerX. The difference between the A1-R SIINF group and each other group was non-significant (n.s.). The lower three rows analyzed cytokine production by SIINF-specific CD8+ T cells from the tumor. The same tumor cell suspensions, as analyzed in the upper two rows, were restimulated with SIINF peptide in the presence of Brefeldin A for 5 hrs. Cells were stained with SIINF/Kb-dimerX or control SIYR/Kb-dimerX, anti-CD8, anti-IFN-γ, and anti-TNF- α. Top panel shows a representative anti-IFN-γ and anti-TNF-α stain from gated SIINF/Kb-dimerX+ CD8+ double-positive cells. The bottom panels show pooled data. The percentage of IFN-γ+ or IFN-γ+TNF-α+ cells was defined as the percentage of SIINF-specific CD8+ T cells that stained positive with anti-IFN-γ and/or anti-TNF-α compared to the isotype controls. The A1-R control treatment group consisted of 4 mice treated with A1-R SNFV. ***p≤0.001 when comparing A1-R SIINF to each other group. **p≤0.002 when comparing A1-R OVA to each other group.
Figure 4
Figure 4. A1-R SIINF treatment results in a SIINF-specific CD8+ T cell-dependent antitumor effect on established B16-OVA tumors
C57BL/6 mice bearing established B16-OVA tumors were left untreated; treated one time with A1-R control; treated one time with A1-R SIINF; or treated one time with A1-R SIINF followed by treatment with the αCD8 depletion antibody. Lines indicate individual mice. The 4 mice that rejected the tumor following A1-R SIINF treatment were held for at least 100 days post-treatment. To determine if the tumors were eradicated, 3 of these mice were injected with 3 doses of 200 µg αCD8 at 3 day intervals. There was no tumor outgrowth for the 34 days following CD8+ T cell depletion before the mice were sacrificed. The A1-R control treatment group consisted of 3 mice treated with A1-R EGFP and 2 mice treated with A1-R SNFV. † indicates a single mouse that died during the experiment.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Treatment with A1-R SIINF combined with anti-PD-L1 results in enhanced SIINF-specific CD8+ T cell expansion and consistent tumor rejection
A) C57BL/6 mice bearing established B16-OVA tumors were treated as indicated. A blue dot represents the initial time of treatment with αCTLA-4 and αPD-L1 for an individual mouse. A red dot represents treatment with A1-R SIINF for an individual mouse. In each treatment group, mice were treated with 100 µg αCTLA-4 and/or 150 µg αPD-L1 every third day until the tumor relapsed completely (>1.5 cm3) or was rejected. Mice that rejected tumors were held for at least 100 days post-treatment prior to administration of 3 doses of 200 µg αCD8 at 3 day intervals. There was no tumor outgrowth for at least 40 days post-CD8+ T cell depletion before the mice were sacrificed, demonstrating that tumors were fully eradicated. B) At 8 or 9 days post-treatment, the peripheral blood from mice in the indicated treatment groups was stained with anti-CD8 and SIINF/Kb-dimerX. The percentage of SIINF-specific CD8+ T cells from mice that rejected B16-OVA versus relapsed following A1-R SIINF treatment was significantly different (p<0.01).

References

    1. Monach PA, Meredith SC, Siegel CT, Schreiber H. A unique tumor antigen produced by a single amino acid substitution. Immunity. 1995;2:45–59. - PubMed
    1. Coulie PG, Lehmann F, Lethe B, Herman J, Lurquin C, Andrawiss M, et al. A mutated intron sequence codes for an antigenic peptide recognized by cytolytic T lymphocytes on a human melanoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:7976–7980. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolfel T, Hauer M, Schneider J, Serrano M, Wolfel C, Klehmann-Hieb E, et al. A p16INK4a-insensitive CDK4 mutant targeted by cytolytic T lymphocytes in a human melanoma. Science. 1995;269:1281–1284. - PubMed
    1. Berendt MJ, North RJ. T-cell-mediated suppression of anti-tumor immunity. An explanation for progressive growth of an immunogenic tumor. J Exp Med. 1980;151:69–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Willimsky G, Blankenstein T. Sporadic immunogenic tumours avoid destruction by inducing T-cell tolerance. Nature. 2005;437:141–146. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms