Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan 23:15:32.
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-32.

The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise

Affiliations

The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise

Catrin Tudur Smith et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Research into the methods used in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of clinical trials is essential to ensure that effective methods are available and that clinical decisions made using results from trials are based on the best available evidence, which is reliable and robust.

Methods: An on-line Delphi survey of 48 UK Clinical Research Collaboration registered Clinical Trials Units (CTUs) was undertaken. During round one, CTU Directors were asked to identify important topics that require methodological research. During round two, their opinion about the level of importance of each topic was recorded, and during round three, they were asked to review the group's average opinion and revise their previous opinion if appropriate. Direct reminders were sent to maximise the number of responses at each round. Results are summarised using descriptive methods.

Results: Forty one (85%) CTU Directors responded to at least one round of the Delphi process: 25 (52%) responded in round one, 32 (67%) responded in round two, 24 (50%) responded in round three. There were only 12 (25%) who responded to all three rounds and 18 (38%) who responded to both rounds two and three. Consensus was achieved amongst CTU Directors that the top three priorities for trials methodological research were 'Research into methods to boost recruitment in trials' (considered the highest priority), 'Methods to minimise attrition' and 'Choosing appropriate outcomes to measure'. Fifty other topics were included in the list of priorities and consensus was reached that two topics, 'Radiotherapy study designs' and 'Low carbon trials', were not priorities.

Conclusions: This priority setting exercise has identified the research topics felt to be most important to the key stakeholder group of Directors of UKCRC registered CTUs. The use of robust methodology to identify these priorities will help ensure that this work informs the trials methodological research agenda, with a focus on topics that will have most impact and relevance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Part of the on-line data collection form used in round three.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Response pattern and characteristics of 48 Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) Directors at each round of Delphi process.

References

    1. Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D, Badenoch D, Straus S, Haynes B, Oxford centre for evidence-based medicine - levels of evidence (March 2009) Available from: http://www.cebm.net/?O=1025.
    1. UKCRC registered clinical trials units network. Available from: http://www.ukcrc-ctu.org.uk/
    1. Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ. 1995;311:376–380. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.376. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. GRADE working group (20 June 2013) Available from: http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org.
    1. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Devane D, Gargon E. et al.Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials. 2012;13:132. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-132. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types