Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan 23:4:3809.
doi: 10.1038/srep03809.

Density and abundance of badger social groups in England and Wales in 2011-2013

Johanna Judge  1 , Gavin J Wilson  1 , Roy Macarthur  2 , Richard J Delahay  1 , Robbie A McDonald  3
Affiliations

Density and abundance of badger social groups in England and Wales in 2011-2013

Johanna Judge et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

In the United Kingdom, European badgers Meles meles are a protected species and an important wildlife reservoir of bovine tuberculosis. We conducted a survey of badger dens (main setts) in 1614 1 km squares across England and Wales, between November 2011 and March 2013. Using main setts as a proxy for badger social groups, the estimated mean density of badger social groups in England and Wales was 0.485 km(-2) (95% confidence interval 0.449-0.521) and the estimated abundance of social groups was 71,600 (66,400-76,900). In the 25 years since the first survey in 1985-88, the annual rate of increase in the estimated number of badger social groups was 2.6% (2.2-2.9%), equating to an 88% (70-105%) increase across England and Wales. In England, we estimate there has been an increase of 103% (83-123%) in badger social groups, while in Wales there has been little change (-25 to +49%).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Estimates of badger main sett (a) density and (b) abundance in England and Wales and by Land Class Group in three surveys.
Shaded blocks indicate 95% confidence intervals for means. No main setts were identified in LCG 7 in the 2011–13 survey.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Estimates of changes in badger main sett (a) density and (b) abundance in England and Wales and by Land Class Group between 1985–88 and 2011–13.
Shaded blocks indicate 95% confidence intervals for estimates of change. Where these do not overlap the red line, indicating no change, the change is considered statistically significant.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distribution of the seven Land Class Groups in England and Wales.
Urban areas are not coloured. Map created in ESRI ArcGIS 10.1.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Distribution of surveyed 1 km squares in England and Wales.
Map created in ESRI ArcGIS 10.1.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Cassidy A. Vermin, victims and disease: UK framings of badgers in and beyond the bovine TB controversy. Sociol. Rural. 52, 192–214; 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00562.x (2012).
    1. Gortazar C. et al. The status of tuberculosis in European wild mammals. Mammal Rev. 42, 193–206; 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2011.00191.x (2012).
    1. Godfray H. C. J. et al. A restatement of the natural science evidence base relevant to the control of bovine tuberculosis in Great Britain. Proc. R. Soc. B. 280, 20131634; 10.1098/rspb.2013.1634 (2013). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donnelly C. A. et al. Impact of localized badger culling on tuberculosis incidence in British cattle. Nature 426, 834–837; 10.1038/nature02192 (2003). - PubMed
    1. Donnelly C. A. et al. Positive and negative effects of widespread badger culling on tuberculosis in cattle. Nature 439, 843–846; 10.1038/nature04454 (2006). - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources