Comment
doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-3091-8.
Epub 2014 Jan 24.
Letter to the Editor re: Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis
Affiliations
- PMID: 24458859
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-3091-8
Item in Clipboard
Comment
Letter to the Editor re: Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis
Eur Radiol.
2014 Apr.
No abstract available
Comment in
-
Reply to Letter to the Editor re: Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2014 Apr;24(4):928-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-3092-7. Epub 2014 Jan 18. Eur Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24442445 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2014 Mar;24(3):595-602. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-3012-x. Eur Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24121712
Similar articles
-
Reply to Letter to the Editor re: Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2014 Apr;24(4):928-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-3092-7. Epub 2014 Jan 18. Eur Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24442445 No abstract available.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2014 Mar;24(3):595-602. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-3012-x. Eur Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24121712
-
Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Dec;166(3):765-773. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4458-3. Epub 2017 Aug 17. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017. PMID: 28819781
-
Advanced applications of digital mammography: tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography.Semin Roentgenol. 2007 Oct;42(4):243-52. doi: 10.1053/j.ro.2007.06.006. Semin Roentgenol. 2007. PMID: 17919527 Review. No abstract available.
-
Breast Cancer Screening via Digital Mammography, Synthetic Mammography, and Tomosynthesis.Am J Prev Med. 2020 Mar;58(3):470-472. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.09.016. Epub 2019 Nov 13. Am J Prev Med. 2020. PMID: 31732323 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
[Low-dose digital breast tomosynthsis imaging via noise correlation based penalized weighted least-squares algorithm].Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2018 Jan 30;38(1):48-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2018.01.08. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2018. PMID: 33177026 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Characterisation of microcalcification clusters on 2D digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): does DBT underestimate microcalcification clusters? Results of a multicentre study.Eur Radiol. 2015 Jan;25(1):9-14. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3402-8. Epub 2014 Aug 29. Eur Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25163902 Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
