Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan 24;4(1):e003835.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003835.

Use of strategies to improve retention in primary care randomised trials: a qualitative study with in-depth interviews

V C Brueton  1 , F Stevenson, C L Vale, S P Stenning, J F Tierney, S Harding, I Nazareth, S Meredith, G Rait
Affiliations

Use of strategies to improve retention in primary care randomised trials: a qualitative study with in-depth interviews

V C Brueton et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To explore the strategies used to improve retention in primary care randomised trials.

Design: Qualitative in-depth interviews and thematic analysis.

Participants: 29 UK primary care chief and principal investigators, trial managers and research nurses.

Methods: In-depth face-to-face interviews.

Results: Primary care researchers use incentive and communication strategies to improve retention in trials, but were unsure of their effect. Small monetary incentives were used to increase response to postal questionnaires. Non-monetary incentives were used although there was scepticism about the impact of these on retention. Nurses routinely used telephone communication to encourage participants to return for trial follow-up. Trial managers used first class post, shorter questionnaires and improved questionnaire designs with the aim of improving questionnaire response. Interviewees thought an open trial design could lead to biased results and were negative about using behavioural strategies to improve retention. There was consensus among the interviewees that effective communication and rapport with participants, participant altruism, respect for participant's time, flexibility of trial personnel and appointment schedules and trial information improve retention. Interviewees noted particular challenges with retention in mental health trials and those involving teenagers.

Conclusions: The findings of this qualitative study have allowed us to reflect on research practice around retention and highlight a gap between such practice and current evidence. Interviewees describe acting from experience without evidence from the literature, which supports the use of small monetary incentives to improve the questionnaire response. No such evidence exists for non-monetary incentives or first class post, use of which may need reconsideration. An exploration of barriers and facilitators to retention in other research contexts may be justified.

Keywords: Primary Care; Randomised trials; Retention strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Questionnaire design features reported by interviewees to improve questionnaire return.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Janson SL, Alioto ME, Boushey HA. Attrition and retention of ethnically diverse subjects in a multicenter randomized controlled research trial. Control Clin Trials 2001;22(6, S 1):S236–43 - PubMed
    1. Brueton VC, Tierney J, Stenning S, et al. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;12:MR000032. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sutherland HJ, Beaton M, Mazer R, et al. A randomized trial of the total design method for the postal follow-up of women in a cancer prevention trial. Eur J Cancer Prev 1996;5:165–8 - PubMed
    1. Avenell A, Grant AM, McGee M, et al. The effects of an open design on trial participant recruitment, compliance and retention—a randomized controlled trial comparison with a blinded, placebo-controlled design. Clin Trials 2004;1:490–8 - PubMed
    1. Tai SS, Nazareth I, Haines A, et al. A randomized trial of the impact of telephone and recorded delivery reminders on the response rate to research questionnaires. J Public Health 1997;19:219–21 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources